Abstract

This paper aims to identify the polemical target of Spinoza’s critique of final causes in the Appendix to the first part of the Ethics. I assess Spinoza’s arguments on the background of a comparison between Aristotle’s own account of unthoughtful teleology and Adriaan Heereboord’s account of final causes proposed in his Meletemata Philosophica (1654). Although Heereboord explicitly presents himself as an Aristotelian and an anti-scholastic, his view on final causes is at odds with that of Aristotle and can be rather traced back to Suárez. The paper proves that Spinoza’s arguments are effective against Heereboord’s view, but not against Aristotle’s.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1538-4586
Print ISSN
0022-5053
Pages
pp. 395-420
Launched on MUSE
2016-08-10
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.