In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Self-Projection: The Director’s Image in Art Cinema by Linda Haverty Rugg
  • Najmeh Moradiyan Rizi
Linda Haverty Rugg, Self-Projection: The Director’s Image in Art Cinema. The University of Minnesota Press, 2014. 248 pages. Paper. $25.00.

Since the 1960s and the emergence of Auteur Theory in film studies, the recognition of film directors has found a new direction. In Self Projection, Linda Haverty Rugg explores the role of directors in art cinema as the creative source behind their films. In her engaging study, she explains how a director’s desire to be recognized as the creator of the film overlaps with the spectator’s acknowledgement of the director as the film’s author and creates a complex cinematic spectatorship. This spectatorship foregrounds a notion of constructed “Self” on and off screen that is directly related to the author as a person and is projected to the viewer through the cinematic apparatus. This cinematic interrelationship, therefore, constitutes a collaborative subjectivity that resides in the connection of director/author, actor, and spectator. Some directors might appear in their films while others might project some parts of their real life through its embodiment by an actor. In either case, the author’s self-projection connects the systems of production and reception. To closely examine this connection, Harverty Rugg focuses on specific male film authors, including Ingmar Bergman, Francois Truffaut, Woody Allen, Pedro Almodovar, Werner Herzog, Andrei Tarkovsky, Federico Fellini, and Lars von Trier. In four chapters, she discusses how the dominance of an auteurist vision works toward the construction of an author’s “self-hood.”

Chapter One centers on the appearance of a director/author within a filmic narrative. Here, the performing body of the director on the screen connects to the body of the director off screen and blurs the boundaries of cinematic and real worlds. In fact, the perception of the director’s role on the screen is understood through a self-projection related to his status as a filmmaker off screen. Woody Allen’s appearance in his films is a good example in this regard as Allen’s specific voice, body gestures, and expressions are not merely a caricatured portrayal of him; rather, as Haverty Rugg puts it, “this is a person the viewer has come to know, not just as a name or a style but as an embodied being” (43). It is important to note that Allen seems to sustain his signature gestures and bodily expressions beyond his films, which further strengthens the viewer’s association of his roles on the screen with his nonfictional persona. Chapter Two is based on the roles of directors as directors in narrative films, with a specific focus on documentaries and mockumentaries representing the making of authors’ films. For instance, the documentary Ingmar Bergman Makes a Movies (1963) by Vilgot Sjöman, centering on the making of Winter Light (Nattvardsgästerna, 1963), is not only about the production process of an author’s film, but it also foregrounds Ingmar Bergman’s figure as the film’s director and highlights his cinematic agency as the main vision behind the film. Here, the representation of author as the director within the film’s narrative provides a close interaction of the director projected on the screen with his real-life persona and the self-projection in this situation emerges through the emphasis on the author’s figure and his eminent agency. Chapter Three works with the idea of the author’s embodiment in a film through an actor who is an innate part of author’s self-projection. Through this embodiment, both the bodies and the minds of director and actor align with each other so that the actor works as a mediator between the director and the spectator in the process of author’s recognition. One of the main instances in this regard is the professional and personal relationship between Jean-Pierre Léaud and Francois Truffaut. Following the appearance of Léaud in The 400 Blows (Les quatre cents coups, 1959) as Antoine Doinel, Truffaut and Léaud continued their cinematic collaboration for almost 20 years by working on the character of “Antoine Doinel.” In fact, Jean-Pierre...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 60-61
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.