The oceans are subject to the regime of the international law of the sea, but lack of compliance with the rules by tyrants, terrorists, and traffickers means that real ocean governance is often elusive. The framework for ocean governance was painstakingly wrought over decades of consensus building and compulsion, and it accords rights and responsibilities to states and their activities at sea. Governance at sea works when flag states properly maintain and regulate ships that fly their flag, coastal states prescribe and enforce laws in their maritime zones, and port states exercise appropriate authority over vessels entering port. When states do not fulfill their obligations, by failing to adhere to international standards for their ships, for example, or when states exceed their authority over foreign vessels, such as asserting jurisdiction over foreign warships near their shores, uncertainty ensues. A stable, predictable order of the oceans gives way to criminal enterprises that operate on the water, and the destabilizing and arbitrary assertion of power by coastal states. The “outlaw sea” is a function of international criminal organizations embedded in or preying on marine industries, or the penchant of some states to commit misfeasance, malfeasance, and nonfeasance at sea. The key to bringing the rule of law and good order at sea is to improve state compliance with the law of the sea across all three dimensions of flag, coastal, and port state duties.


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 87-96
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.