In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The Last Days of Mankind by Karl Kraus
  • Paul David Young (bio)
BOOK REVIEWED: The Last Days of Mankind, by Karl Kraus, translated from the German by Fred Bridgham and Edward Timms. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.

The triumphal rhetoric of war repeatedly seduces the public. As it was in Karl Kraus’s Austria, so it is today in the U.S. with the current crop of Republican presidential candidates recklessly advocating military intervention, e.g. Ted “Carpet Bomb” Cruz. I’m afraid Senator Cruz and other warmongers will not take the opportunity to enjoy the very fine work that Bridgham and Timms have done to offer the English-speaking world a complete translation of Karl Kraus’s epic, World War I satire The Last Days of Mankind (Die Letzten Tage der Menschheit). Nonetheless, the translators, and Kraus himself, should be commended for attempting to teach mankind the as yet unlearned lesson of the folly of war.

Though still virtually unknown in the English-speaking world, Kraus was in his time and remains today one of the most famous German-language humorists. In their excellent, brief introduction, the translators sketch Kraus’s career as founder and writer of the influential and popular satirical periodical Die Fackel (The Torch). They bring out Kraus’s singular dedication to exposing warmongers’ lies before, during, and after World War I, while other Austrian writers and journalists mythologized the monarchy, warfare, and nationalism and wrote purple “battlefront” prose from the safety of Vienna or mountain retreats, far from the slaughter they praised.

This is the first unabridged English translation of Kraus’s epochal work. Though Gode and Wright’s 1974 translation holds up well today, it is missing great quantities of the original text. The publisher of that book, Frederick Ungar, notes in his introduction, “I vividly remember the impression made on me when as a young man of twenty I attended one of Kraus’s public readings; I missed only a few of his later readings. On such occasions the hall was filled with a capacity audience electrified by intellectual and emotional excitement.” Like Dickens and Mayakovsky, Kraus was an author/actor who occupied the stage with pleasure. Bridgham and Timms do not match Ungar’s personal recollection, but they do render Kraus successfully for the twenty-first century reader.

The Last Days of Mankind is absurdly long. Bridgham and Timms’ translation runs 560 pages. The dramatis personae alone add some twenty-five pages more. [End Page 131] Kraus opens his own introduction by wryly referring to the length of his play, “The performance of this drama, which would take some ten evenings in terrestrial time, is intended for a theatre on Mars.” The translators note that only the Epilogue was staged during Kraus’s lifetime. Prevented from publishing it because of wartime censorship, Kraus first brought out the play serially in Die Fackel in the 1920s.

Kraus’s sprawling, unorthodox play crackles with his specific ear for Austrians and Germans at various strata of society and in an assortment of contexts. For the most part, the translators of this new English-language edition, like Gode and Wright in their 1974 translation, wisely abandon any attempt to reproduce the infinite gradations of slang and dialect that Kraus, a Mark Twain of German colloquial speech, rendered so faithfully. Reading transcribed dialect can be wearying. Gode and Wright, who had their eye on a broad American audience, used some American slang but mostly stayed with standard English. Since Brits Bridgham and Timms want to make Kraus’s work accessible and relevant, they were right to follow Gode and Wright and stick to plain speech, while sprinkling in some British vernacular.

The play abounds in very particular references to periodicals, events, writers, and military and government figures, then well known but now completely obscure. Instead of explanatory footnotes in the text, the translators provide a helpful glossary at the end. The entries give enough information and substance for the reader to appreciate Kraus’s specificity, without getting lost in arcana. Gode and Wright’s edition did not include such a critical apparatus, presumably not wanting to scare off the American reading public.

The Last...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 131-133
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.