Introduction to Public Health and Incarceration: Social Justice Matters

Overview

Providing health care in jails, prisons, half-way houses, and community-supervised correctional programs, correctional facilities, and community systems has a direct effect on health outcomes of incarcerated populations. Moreover, effective linkages to a myriad of services upon release and assistance with community reintegration are key components for reducing recidivism. In an effort to highlight some of the disparity issues and challenges in corrections, we offer this issue, titled, Public Health and Incarceration: Social Justice Matters.

In 2012, U.S. state prison systems, comprising 50 independent entities, incarcerated over 1.3 million people, of whom a disproportionate share were minorities, primarily African Americans and Hispanics.¹ Despite recent reports that 2012 marked a decrease in the number of imprisonments of males and females, the U.S. continues to lead the world in incarceration of its residents. The reported decrease in incarceration may be attributed to alternative sentences, such as probation, which maintains individuals under correctional supervision. Mass incarceration disrupts families and affects health status and the quality of life within families. Prisoners are more likely than the general population to have chronic health conditions and infectious diseases. In 2012, 43.9% of offenders reported a chronic condition, relative to 31.0% of the general population; 21.0% of offenders had had an infectious disease, relative to 4.8% of the general population. The disparities in mental health and substance abuse are equally troubling.² These health risks are not proportionately distributed across populations.

African American males have an imprisonment rate of 2,841 per 100,000; Hispanic males have a rate of 1,158 per 100,000; and White males have a rate of 463 per 100,000. There are similar disparities for African American and Hispanic females relative to Whites.¹ Although some of the health problems experienced by offenders are addressed during their incarceration, many are not addressed upon their release, which poses serious health risks for the former offenders and for the local communities to which they return. Health problems of former offenders become those of the local community, where there may be little knowledge and discussion related to the intersections of corrections, public health, and reentry for this subset of a vulnerable population. This special issue of the JHCPU—with a focus on disparities related to racial and ethnic minorities, reentry, and public health—explores innovative research, services, and programs that deal with the health of the offender population.

The social justice system is burdened with imperfections deleterious to health equity. The system disproportionately lessens the life opportunities of African Americans, Latinos, and other disadvantaged ethnic minority groups. Eliminating such imperfections is a formidable task, but nevertheless one that must be accomplished if the nation is to achieve true health equity. The articles in this issue of the JHCPU report on strategies for change.

In the commentary by Ferguson, et al., a strong case is made that systems change is the “order of the day”; this case is eloquently presented as a “Call for Action.” While there have been many other such appeals, this call offers recommendations for clinical practice, criminal justice studies, health science institutions, and communities. Much like the compelling call for action in Michelle Alexander’s book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, a stage is set for sector stakeholders to move in a new direction, one involving sector accountability without compromise. We must change the mass incarceration practices and eliminate their catastrophic effects on racial and ethnic minorities, in the U.S.

In the manuscript by Coughlin, Lewis, and Smith, developments in ethics in the context of the racial/ethnic disparities that exist in corrections, are discussed. Ethical considerations in clinical and public health research on HIV in prison and jail settings are considered. Factors in mental health research are summarized, along with issues pertaining to research involving female inmates. The ethics of research involving incarcerated people extends beyond traditional ethical concerns related to human subjects to include issues in the domains of bioethics and public health ethics. Tamburello and...