In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Greece, the EEC and the Cold War, 1974–1979: The Second Enlargement by Eirini Karamouzi
  • Jonathan Swarts (bio)
Eirini Karamouzi, Greece, the EEC and the Cold War, 1974–1979: The Second Enlargement. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014. Pp. xi + 258. Cloth £60/$90.

Given the current controversy over Greece’s relationship to the European Union, a book examining the deliberations, negotiations, and issues involved in Greece’s accession to the then-European Economic Community (EEC) could not be timelier. For its detailed historical analysis, as well as the fascinating insights that it offers about Greece’s longer-term place in the EU, Eirini Karamouzi’s new book is very welcome indeed.

Based primarily on recently opened official archives, Karamouzi’s study is the first comprehensive history focusing on the internal deliberations within the EEC and on the negotiations between the Nine (the EEC member states at the time) and Greece. Karamouzi concentrates specifically on the years between the restoration of Greek democracy and the reactivation of relations between Greece and the EEC in 1974 and the signing of the accession treaty in Athens in 1979.

The book begins with an analysis of the push for EEC membership by Constantine Karamanlis. Having become prime minister again on the collapse of the military dictatorship in July 1974, Karamanlis made membership in the EEC a primary goal. With anti-Americanism in Greece running extremely high (given perceptions of US complicity in the dictatorship and anger over US foreign policy towards the Turkish invasion of Cyprus) and with the newly restored democracy still fragile, Karamanlis saw Greece’s entry into the EEC as a critically important element in stabilizing a pro-Western orientation in Greece and, most significantly, in cementing the new regime as a consolidated European democracy. The key to EEC membership, Karamouzi argues, was “the overriding importance of the democratisation factor in Karamanlis’ quest for Europe” (15). As if to illustrate the linkage between the new democracy and EEC membership, Karamanlis lodged Greece’s application with the Community the very day after the newly ratified constitution came into force in June 1975.

Having analyzed Karamanlis’ strategy and motivations for EEC membership, Karamouzi then turns to a detailed discussion of the Greek application for membership and the deliberations and negotiations that eventually produced a successful agreement. Here, she highlights the initial Greek disappointment that its 1961 Association Agreement with the EEC—and its 1974 reactivation following the suspension of relations during the junta years—would not lead directly and rapidly to full membership. In fact, the initial reaction of the nine member states—and especially of the European Commission, the EEC’s executive body—was decidedly cool, welcoming only “the desire of Greece” to join (40). The Nine favored Greek membership in principle, but given the world economic crisis of the time, the weakness of the Greek economy, and the perceived institutional stagnation of the Community, the dominant view was that Greek membership would have to wait.

This attitude would come to change, however. As Karamouzi describes it, Karamanlis went on a successful public relations campaign to argue that Europe had a primary responsibility, over and above any technical issues or disagreements, to support the fledgling Greek democracy as a matter of principle. This argument, Karamouzi demonstrates, dovetailed perfectly with a movement already underway within the EEC to redefine its own purpose—away from the immediate postwar focus on peace and [End Page 187] mutual security to that of a mature, outward-looking institution promoting freedom, democracy, and human rights. Given the EEC’s emerging self-identity as a community of states committed to democratic principles, Karamanlis’ rhetoric on the need to promote democracy in Greece “made it difficult for any member state to incur the odium of asking for a delay or rebuffing the application despite the evident awareness of the problems involved” (50). “[I]n an atmosphere where opposition to Greek accession was construed as a negation of the country’s democratic ideals” (60), the Nine endorsed Greece’s application to join in February 1976, with negotiations beginning in July.

Karamouzi then analyzes in rich detail the internal discussions within the EEC over the details of Greek...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 187-189
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.