Abstract

This paper presents a constructivist framework for design thinking based on the recognition that there are different kinds of generative propositions. five different “What if . . . ?” questions are identified. It is offered that subsequent design development occurs in two ways. first, intensive development seeks an increasingly precise understanding of a proposed change by refining the generative proposition with respect to the initial “What if . . . ?” question. Second, extensive development seeks an increasingly comprehensive understanding of a proposed change by applying, adapting, and adjusting the generative proposition with respect to the other “What if . . . ?” questions. It is suggested that when both kinds of design development are performed successfully, the generative proposition of change becomes a reasoned argument for change.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1553-2704
Print ISSN
0277-2426
Pages
pp. 127-138
Launched on MUSE
2016-03-15
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.