In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Capital as Will and Imagination: Schumpeter’s Guide to the Postwar Japanese Miracle by Mark Metzler
  • Penelope Francks
Mark Metzler. Capital as Will and Imagination: Schumpeter’s Guide to the Postwar Japanese Miracle. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013. xvii + 295 pp. ISBN 9780801451799, $49.95 (cloth).

Mark Metzler has been in the forefront of moves to treat Japan’s economic history not as a unique curiosity explicable only to specialists, but rather as an analytically important element in global processes of change. He is also an original, challenging and stylish writer and his work can profitably and enjoyably be approached by readers beyond the particular bounds of Japanese history. In this book, he follows up his fascinating account of Japan’s experience of the gold standard in the interwar years (Lever of Empire, 2006) with a rather different kind of study examining the theoretical underpinnings and practical development of the policy framework within which Japan’s post-World War II “economic miracle” occurred. By this means, he is able to make the far-reaching argument that an elite group of Japanese academics and officials pioneered the form of credit-driven industrial growth that has transformed major parts of the world economy in which we now live.

As his headline-grabbing title suggests, Metzler assigns a key role in his argument to the now-neglected theories of the Austrian economic thinker Joseph Schumpeter. In Schumpeter’s model, economies develop through technology-driven cycles of investment (together with “creative destruction”), which are funded not by prior savings, but by means of the creation of credit-money in a process very different from that envisaged in the kinds of neoclassical approaches that have dominated economic thinking in more recent times. Metzler shows how key Japanese economists and officials took Schumpeter’s thinking on board during periods of study in interwar Germany. On this basis, as they adapted wartime economic experience and institutions to the realities of the shattered postwar economy and the occupation, they proceeded to develop a system of “capitalist planning” whereby credit creation within the banking system was used to fund industrial investment under the direction of the economic bureaucracy. The later chapters of the book then detail the political and administrative mechanisms of the “modified capitalism” under which Schumpeterian bureaucrats used the allocation of bank credit, via the Bank of Japan, to promote and manage the surge in competitive business investment that powered the miracle. The result, Metzler argues, was that Japan became the foremost proponent of a form of planned, finance-driven capitalism, the diffusion of which has produced a “new epoch in world industrial history” (p. 173). [End Page 230]

Metzler’s approach to writing his history is unconventional, and he perhaps indulges himself more than is necessary in the kind of philosophic musing his title suggests. The idea that money is a human creation that works only because we believe in it (hence “will and imagination”) hardly shocks economists. In fact, the early theoretical stages of the book took me back to my undergraduate economics days spent trying to understand what “capital,” “value,” and the nature of money might be, and will not say anything particularly new to economists (at least of a certain age), though they might be useful (if difficult) for historians of Japan. Equally, some aspects of the story Metzler tells are already quite familiar from existing work on the Japanese economy; this book might usefully be read alongside both Metzler’s own study of the prewar period and, for example, Scott O’Bryan’s The Growth Idea (2009) on the policy background to the postwar miracle, not to mention Chalmers Johnson’s MITI and the Japanese Miracle (1982) and the large body of literature that it generated. Nonetheless, Metzler’s genius is to bring everything together within a distinctive theoretical framework that enables him to make his provocative and original case for the significance of Japan’s economic history as revealing fundamental features of the way capitalism has come to work in much of the contemporary world.

For economic historians of Japan, Metzler’s argument, while fitting in with the new emphasis on the prewar and wartime origins of much...

pdf

Share