Abstract

Skinnerian approaches to political thinking strictly bifurcate “past” and “present.” I argue that this is a simplistic understanding of political time—one sustainable only within a worldview where history is not felt as personally haunting. I substantiate my argument through an analysis of key passages in African American political thought. Thinkers like Du Bois and Baldwin center their inquiries on the very questions that the Cambridge School evades: When does the past begin to be past? When does the past cease to be present? How do we forge a language fully adequate to past and present’s complex relation?

Additional Information

ISSN
1092-311X
Print ISSN
2572-6633
Launched on MUSE
2016-01-26
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.