-
The International “Ost-Ranenie” Festival
- Leonardo
- The MIT Press
- Volume 28, Number 1, February 1995
- pp. 78-79
- Article
- Additional Information
one would dare. This invitation to par ticipate introduced an interactive theme evident in Jim Campbell's neigh boring installation. Jim Campbell's Shadow (for Heisenberg) was the most sophisticated high-tech spectacle in the exhibition. Conceptu ally, this work illustrates Heisenberg's uncertainty principle [1], which states that nothing can be accurately measured and that the element introduced in mea surement affects the measurement itself. Aesthetically, Campbell's work grapples with interactivity in a unique way. Perhaps because Campbell's piece was included in this milieu, it donned an artistic luster that might not be evi dent in the context of a more high-tech arena. But here, instead of being dis played as an object, it was dropped into its own cubicle as an installation, and the lack of relationship to open space tarnished its aesthetic potential. If situ ated openly in the gallery, Shadow might have been more successful as a self-contained sculpture. The viewer sees a clear box in which a small Buddha resides. Campbell de scribes his selection as "almost a cliche, but it works in terms of the piece being about not seeing what you want to see" [2]. As the viewer approaches the work, a list screen gradually obscures it, pre venting the viewer from getting a closer look. This kind of interactivity contrasts with most other interactive work, where viewer/participants can control what they wish to see. Black-and-white images were pro jected onto the wall from the far end of the box. These ectoplasmic projections comprised changing, irregular forms that dwarfishly reflected the viewer's fe verish attempts to look into the box. If these reflections were large enough to engulf the space and therefore empha size the spectator's search, the total ef fect might have been more dynamic. On the other hand, Louis deSoto of fered a video of television static in an in stallation perfectly scaled to its enclosed space. He says that it is "based on a simple media phenomenon" [3]. I inter pret this work as pure audiovisual ab straction. Or, taking my view a step fur ther to enrich the experience, I could alternately view the piece conceptually as either interventions from outer space (as deSoto suggests) or an animated ver sion of the quintessential minimalist art of stripes across a canvas. DeSoto's piece calls to mind a number of contemporary artists such as early Frank Stella, Brice Marden or Agnes Martin. A more temporal piece, but one that contributes dramatically to the overall character of the exhibit, was John i.ii|si!!;,*>.p¥«i|p»ifj(»te': k "■■ '? s 1 ί;ί I Roloff's RottingFlame. This towering construction, a treelike form of steel and real oranges, protruded horizon tally from a wall. As a complement, re kindling the flamelike form of the tree, an adjacent videotape displayed images of fire through which scrolled a visual mantra of the names of physiologically active chemical compounds. Gail Wight broadened the scientific context of the exhibit with her Somatology Blisters (Fig. 2), a series of eye droppers and test tubes labeled and filled with bluish liquid; the test tubes were secured on Q _ panels and arranged in a grid. This imaginative spreadsheet of neurotransmitters offered a simple device for stimulating our central ner vous system. "Extreme nostalgia," "hys teria," "ambivalence," "conscious dream state" and "terror" were some of the conditions listed on the test tube labels. Visually eye-catching but inaccessible, the installation design made it ex tremely difficult for the art "pilgrim" to "mount the steps" and read the work. I was barely able to decipher the printed words half-hidden and buried upsidedown in the solutions. Her natural sci ence emulation piece, History of Wish ing, also hard to reach, prompted two observations: (1) Is this another kind of interactivity? and (2) Why does laborintensive graphic artwork induce te dium while arduous high-tech projects produce magical wonderment? In this exhibition, fantasy, playfulness, humor, scale, variety, color, language and psychology were used to manipulate the technological and scientific informa tion toward an aesthetic validity. References 1. Artist's discussion with Steven Jenkins, Art-week (17 February 1994). 2.Jenkins [1]. 3...