In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Masculinity After Trujillo: The Politics of Gender in Dominican Literature by Maja Horn
  • Ignacio López-Calvo
Horn, Maja. Masculinity After Trujillo: The Politics of Gender in Dominican Literature. Gainesville: UP of Florida, 2014. 203 pp.

Maja Horn’s Masculinity After Trujillo is an important contribution to Dominican, Caribbean, and Latin American studies. After the introduction, the first chapter “De-tropicalizing the Trujillo Dictatorship and Dominican Masculinity” analyzes speeches by Rafael Trujillo, Joaquín Balaguer, and other nationalist Dominican letrados to unearth the keys to the Trujillato’s discourse of masculinity, which, according to Horn, was in part a reaction to the long-lasting US occupation of the Dominican Republic and its imposition of a racialized imperial masculinity. The title of chapter two, “One Phallus for Another: Post-dictatorial Political and Literary Canons,” is a pun on the title of one of Doris Sommer’s books, One Master for Another: Populism as Patriarchal Rhetoric in Dominican Novels. In it, the author carries out a close analysis of two novels by Marcio Veloz Maggiolo, De abril en adelante and Uña y carne, to show how even leftist-leaning Dominican intellectuals reinforced this same rhetoric of masculinity during Balaguer’s governments, thus indirectly naturalizing authoritarianism. Horn argues that the attempts by Dominican canonical writers to emasculate the image of Trujillo as the country’s most virile man reproduce the same masculinist ideology popularized by his government. In fact, they reduce serious political problems to the sexual prowess of the dictator’s phallus. In her view, Veloz Maggiolo and other authors reproduce hegemonic notions of gender and sexuality that limit their vision of political resistance.

The third chapter, “Engendering Resistance: Hilma Contreras’s Counter-narratives,” rescues Contreras’s important counter-narratives of resistance, which challenge mainstream notions of honor, masculinity, and sexuality, and propose the recovery of the Trujillato’s cultural practices for anti-hegemonic ends. Horn focuses on the representation of Dominican gender formations in three works by Contreras: 4 cuentos, Doña Endrina de Calatayud, and La tierra está bramando. She also looks at how Dominican cultural practices foster anti-hegemonic alliances and collective forms of action. According to the author, Contreras’s writing presents silence as a site of resistance during the Trujillato. Her novel La tierra está bramando provides examples of strategies of resistance, such as the strategic use of femininity (being seen as a harmless and apolitical subject) beyond masculinist cultural logics and hyper-sexualized imaginary. The author proposes the recovery of the Trujillato’s cultural practices for anti-hegemonic ends and proves that the return of the Dominican diaspora has, in many cases, reinforced hegemonic, masculinist Dominican notions.

The last two chapters explore the effects of globalization, neoliberalism, the tourism industry, global media, mass migration, and diaspora on a new generation of Dominican and Dominican American writers that emerged in the 1990s. In particular, Horn is interested in their critique of the discourse of gender and other hegemonic formations inherited from the Trujillato. “Still Loving Papi: Globalized Dominican Subjectivities in the Novels of Rita Indiana Hernández” studies Hernández’s portrayal of new Dominican subjectivities in her novels La estrategia de la Chochueca and Papi. The chapter that closes the book before the conclusion, [End Page 589] “How Not to Read Junot Díaz: Diasporic Dominican Masculinity and Its Returns,” is perhaps the strongest in the book. According to Horn, Díaz and Hernández show in their works the enduring desirability of hegemonic notions of masculinity for both Dominican men and women, even in the diaspora. Masculinity After Trujillo, therefore, provides an insightful look at the persistent power of masculinism in Dominican post-dictatorship politics and literature, as a result of the US occupation’s collective emasculation of the Dominican male that revitalized nationalist sentiments. Horn’s study of hegemonic discourses from the perspective of the politics of gender reveals often overlooked aspects of Veloz Maggiolo’s and Díaz’s writing. In particular, she shows how these authors reproduce traditional, hegemonic notions of gender and sexuality that limit their vision of political resistance.

Masculinity After Trujillo covers an important body of literature and culture from a hitherto neglected perspective: that of...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 589-590
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.