In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions by Jean Dreze and Amartya Sen
  • Devashish Mitra
Jean Dreze and Amartya Sen. An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions. Princeton, NJ and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press, 2013. xiii + 433 pp. ISBN 978-0-691-16079-5, $29.95 (cloth).

This is a book by two distinguished economists, each of whom has spent a number of years working on the issue of poverty and deprivation. Both have in-depth knowledge and understanding of the complexities of the Indian economy and society, and are outstanding development economists. Sen won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 for his fundamental contributions to welfare economics. Dreze has dedicated all his professional life so far to the fight against poverty, hunger, and deprivation.

This book is on the “New India,” which, according to the authors, is growing rapidly, yet has a very high incidence of poverty, deprivation, [End Page 204] malnutrition, illiteracy, squalor, and disease. The authors provide data on economic and social indicators to show that, in many aspects, India performs worse than much poorer countries. In particular, these indicators are life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, access to improved sanitation, female literacy, the proportion of children below age five who are underweight and stunted, and child immunization rates; along these dimensions, countries such as Vietnam, Laos, Papua New Guinea, Bangladesh, and Nepal are doing better. For example, even though Bangladesh’s per capita income (at purchasing power parity) is less than half of India’s ($1,569 compared with $3,203 in 2011), its life expectancy is higher by four years (69 in Bangladesh versus 65 in India), its child immunization rate is 96 percent compared with India’s 73 percent, and its access to improved sanitation is 56 percent compared with India’s 34 percent. The infant mortality rate in Bangladesh is also much lower than that in India. The authors argue that India performs poorly with respect to these indicators in comparison with many other developing countries, the other BRICS countries, and most other South Asian nations.1 Regarding public health, their main illustration is how poorly India fares relative to other developing countries with regard to immunization against major diseases. The most alarming comparison is the immunization rate against hepatitis B: Only 37 percent of one-year-old children in India have been immunized, whereas the corresponding figure for Bangladesh is 95 percent and the average for “least developed countries” is 78 percent. The authors also provide comparative numbers for the deficiencies in various macronutrients.

Although India can be proud of excellent institutions of higher learning, elementary education, according to the authors, is in pathetic shape. They provide numbers to show this. Only 50 percent of the children ages eight to eleven who attend government schools can read a simple paragraph with three sentences, 64 percent can write a simple sentence with a maximum of two mistakes, and 43 percent can subtract one two-digit number from another. The authors blame this failure on the lack of government spending on elementary education right from the beginning. I think this criticism is a little unfair, because when India became independent its per capita income, in real terms, was a fifth of what it is today, so higher public spending on elementary education in a populous country such as India would be difficult. However, over time there is no doubt that this spending, as a proportion of national income, should have gone up.

The poor social indicators in the presence of rapid economic growth form the main motivation for the book: Why are they so and [End Page 205] what can, and should, be done about them? According to the authors, the reason for India’s poor performance in education and health is the lack of accountability and high levels of corruption in the public sector. For standard economic reasons based on externalities that drive a wedge between private and social benefits and asymmetric information between buyers and sellers, the authors argue against the takeover by the private sector of health, education, electricity and power, and the like. They argue in favor of finding ways to solve the problems of accountability...

pdf

Share