Abstract

David Chinitz’s Which Sin to Bear?: Authenticity and Compromise in Langston Hughes explores the poet’s interest in the concept of racial authenticity, as well as his growing appreciation of “compromise.” The book’s greatest contribution is the first published analysis of Hughes’s executive-session testimony before Joseph McCarthy’s Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Released in 2003, the testimony offers new insight into the rhetoric Hughes adopted while under interrogation. While Hughes’s equivocations on the communist sentiments expressed in his poetry may strike some as a surrender to McCarthy’s scare politics, Chinitz argues that the transcript reveals instead a sequence of deliberately crafted, literary-theoretical rejoinders. This reading serves Chinitz’s argument that, across his career, Hughes became increasingly committed to theorizing an “ethics of compromise.”

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1529-1464
Print ISSN
0022-281X
Pages
pp. 181-184
Launched on MUSE
2015-07-26
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.