In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Maestra by Catherine Murphy
  • Katherine A. Gordy
Maestra. Film. By Catherine Murphy. New York: The Literacy Project, 2011. doi:10.1017/tam.2014.26

In September 1960, over a year after the 26th of July Movement took power in Cuba, Fidel Castro announced to the United Nations the government’s plan to attack illiteracy throughout the country, as the opening scenes of Maestra show. Of the 250,000 Cubans who volunteered for the 1961 literacy campaign, 100,000 were under 18 and more than half were women. It is on the specific experience of these mostly urban women teachers of diverse class backgrounds that this excellent 30-minute documentary focuses, artfully combining historical images and footage from the collection of the Cuban Film Institute (ICAIC) and present-day interviews with nine former women literacy volunteers.

As scholars such as Richard Fagen have noted, even if the purely scholastic success of the literacy campaign was unclear, its dramatic but relatively uncontroversial call to eradicate illiteracy drew in large numbers of Cubans who might not have otherwise participated in the first years of the revolutionary project. The literacy campaign was thus key to the development of the revolution’s political culture and its institutions. The interviews and footage capture the young volunteers’ sense of enthusiasm as well as the danger of the literacy campaign, especially after the Bay of Pigs invasion and the murder of a male literacy volunteer by counter-revolutionary insurgents. We hear and see how these young teachers from the cities came into contact with rural poverty, a critically limited infrastructure, and long days of farm labor, for the first time.

Maestra also takes this focus one step further by examining specifically the campaign’s effects on women and how it enabled them to challenge traditional gender norms. Parents were resistant to granting permission to their daughters, some as young as twelve. Many had to insist upon participating. One of the interviewees reflects that it was in the countryside as a literacy volunteer that she had her “first feeling of freedom” and “began to fall in love with that feeling of independence.” Another says that the literacy campaign enabled her to “gr[o]w as a person,” and “raised her self esteem.” She says the experience “was decisive, in my ability to evaluate myself, to know what I was capable of. After the campaign, I realized that I could aim higher in life. I didn’t have to settle for the future my mom planned for me. I could aspire to more.” For these teachers, their participation could not be reduced to an act of paternalistic charity; rather, it was significant to their own political and personal growth.

The documentary also includes interviews with two students, who comment mostly on the logistics of the campaign. It would have been interesting to hear more from these students, and particularly the women students, although the interviews with teachers do [End Page 178] give us some insight into the ways that campaign challenged traditional gender norms in the countryside. We learn, for instance, of a man who is initially resistant to having his wife learn to read, but ultimately agrees to classes for both himself and his wife. We learn of a woman who, worried by stories of romances between women literacy volunteers and campesinos, comes to accept the teacher into the family. We also learn that students were not simply passive recipients, but challenged their teachers to explain the strange rules of Spanish spelling.

The documentary concludes by citing UNESCO’s 1962 proclamation that illiteracy was eradicated in Cuba. Some have called this success into question, pointing either to Cuba’s already high literacy rate compared to other countries in the region or the standard by which literacy was measured. Comments by some of those interviewed in the documentary, however, highlight the significance for many of the adult students of learning even to write their own names. Rates of illiteracy were significantly higher in the countryside than in the cities. More importantly, the main thrust of the documentary is to show the impact of the campaign, not solely on literacy rates, but on its participants. This emphasis makes the...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 178-179
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.