The Cast of Character: Style in Greek Literature (review)

In this ambitious and interesting book, Nancy Worman uses selected texts from Homer through Gorgias and other rhetorical theorists to examine the conjunction of a speaker's verbal and visible, corporeal mannerisms (a combination she describes in Pierre Bourdieu's term, "bodily hexis") that produces a style of social behavior that conforms to Greek culture's traditional expectations and ideas (Bourdieu's "habitus"). Having "Cast" in the title thus emphasizes the visual: "the cast of character" is the set of "physical and linguistic mannerisms that mark a speaker as a type conforming to a set of socially familiar categories" (1). Its visibility and adherence to type would seem to make character transparent and behavior predictable, and so it seems they are in many cases. But a cast is, after all, an appearance. Alongside this sense of familiarity, argues Worman, the Homeric poems already show a recognition of the dangerous allure of visual style and the possibility that outward character might be separated from inner qualities—a recognition that grows sharper in tragedy and culminates in distrust of the sophists in many quarters. Worman argues that those durable characters, Helen and Odysseus, respectively, embody these two dangers, and she centers her discussion on them.

This is a promising way to look at Greek literature, and Worman carries her approach out well in her readings of particular texts. Perhaps the most suggestive aspect of the book, however, is that it asks us to reconsider our understanding of "style," which we tend to think of as purely textual and rhetorical in the tradition of Aristotle. Worman argues that until the fourth century B.C.E., the Greeks had a traditional understanding of style that was much broader: the projection of character type through bodily hexis(understood as the combination of verbal and corporeal habits). Plato and Aristotle, she suggests, in different ways and each for his own reasons, suppressed the bodily aspects of style that were crucial to the traditional conception, and an adequate account of Greek ideas about style has to begin not with them but with that tradition. In Worman's treatment of it, "style" refers not just to the social performances of characters within texts but also to the performance of the texts themselves (epic, drama, and deictic oratory). Worman comments on the metapoetic (or metarhetorical) dimension of these texts, whereby the bodily hexisof the performer, often in rich costume, either confirms (and is confirmed by) the characters' behavior or undermines it. Her statements to this effect tend to be unsystematic and general, but the approach works extremely well in the case of Gorgias. In the Encomium of Helen, the orator's rich robes and delivery embody and exert the sensual power of language that Gorgias describes and that Helen herself exemplifies, whereas in the Palamedes, by calling attention to performance, the robes and delivery undermine Palamedes' insistence on the convergence of bodily hexisand essential character.

It may seem peculiar that "bodily hexis" comprises linguistic as well as physical behavior, and in Worman's actual practice, the phrase does get stretched considerably at times. But she insists that the Greeks thought of language as corporeal, that performance for them was "a whole-body experience of language" (194). Here, too, the argument is more convincing for rhetorical theory than for the archaic period. There may be more of a problem, however, with the method of presentation in the chapters on epic and tragedy, which often begs the question of language as part of bodily hexis, than there is with the idea itself, which is quite attractive.

After an initial chapter that discusses key terms (kosmos, ethos, and characte \ r), Worman devotes two chapters to Homer. It was probably not the best strategy to treat verbal and corporeal behavior separately in successive chapters, although Worman gives her reasons for doing this. Not only does this...