In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Claiming the Second World War and Its Lost Generation:Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter and the Politics of Emotion
  • Laurel Cohen-Pfister

When the ZDF miniseries Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter aired in March 2013, promoters and critics heralded it as the German television event of the year. Beginning in 1941, before the invasion of the Soviet Union, the miniseries relays the story of five friends, all in their early twenties – two Wehrmacht soldiers (Wilhelm and Friedhelm), one singer (Greta), one newly charged front nurse (Charlotte), and one Jew (Viktor) – who promise on the eve of different deployments to reunite in Berlin when the war is over, “bis Weihnachten.” In the course of three instalments and 270 minutes, the miniseries graphically depicts the horrors of the eastern front, a conquest that was neither swift nor successful, and the emotional and moral devastation of its protagonists. The miniseries concludes in 1945 with the promised reunion, albeit under circumstances far from those once imagined. Its promotional campaign credits the film with introducing a new phase in processing the collective trauma Germans incurred through their experiences in the Second World War: namely, by bringing to life the war generation, full of youth, hopes, and dreams, it facilitates an intergenerational dialogue to break the “silence” on family involvement in war crimes and National Socialism and on the trauma incurred by soldiers (Hempel, “Fernsehereignis”; on cultural trauma, see Alexander; on collective silence, see Giesen; Heimannsberg and Schmidt). Drawing on average more than seven million viewers per episode, the media event clearly struck a nerve in the German psyche, begging the question to what extent hype and fact indeed converge.

While the Second World War has been depicted in German film and television throughout the decades, its representation has reflected evolving stages of working through the German past, the different identity politics of East and West Germany, and shifting generational perspectives borne out through time (see Cooke and Silberman). Within this chronology, Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter appears at a point when cultural representations of non-Jewish German suffering in the Second World War are flooding the market (Cohen-Pfister and Wienroeder-Skinner; Taberner and Berger; Schmitz). As the last members of the war generation die, these representations not only furnish visual or literary entertainment but also provide a social platform for today’s generations of Germans to discuss publicly their nation’s past. The memory debates they fuel reflect tensions between transnational and national memory narratives and the political dimensions of who and what is included in the construction of the national imaginary. [End Page 104] They document a move towards a history that is felt, towards a story that allows an emotional connection with familial experiences of the Second World War (Cohen-Pfister and Wienroeder-Skinner 3–23; von Moltke, “Sympathy” 17). In what has been called the “shift from 1968 to 1989” (von Moltke, “Sympathy” 20), these cultural representations of German suffering in the war make German victimhood alongside the Holocaust a competing, if controversial, national narrative since unification (Cohen-Pfister and Wienroeder-Skinner; Taberner and Berger; Schmitz). Since their constructions of the German war experience both reflect and influence public attitudes, their constitutive role in the memory politics of the Federal Republic warrants examination.

Proclamations that Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter begins yet a new phase in working through a collective German trauma (Schirrmacher) refer to the programmatic emotionalization of the German war experience that consciously skirts conventional didactic discussions on questions of guilt and shame. Just as the American miniseries Holocaust once made Jewish suffering first “real” and “feelable” to German audiences in the late 1970s, so, too – in this thinking – the German miniseries makes the traumatization of ageing parents and grandparents first palpable for their descendants (Hofmann, “Töten”). The miniseries stands, however, in a long line of cultural representations of German victimhood that constitute the “current pervasive emotional turn in Germany’s media landscape” (von Moltke, “Politics” 234), thus tempering radical pronouncements of taboo-breaking. More accurately, one could speak of an intentional suspension of moral judgement on the war generation in order to reclaim its emotional experience of life under National Socialism, indeed, in...

pdf

Share