Abstract

This essay analyzes the differences between traditional and Kantian retributivism. Poe’s revenge tales not only highlight the intricate links between the Law and superego evil but also lay bare the agenda of the perverse subjects of the Law. Vengeance is often justified on legal grounds: law-preserving violence, law-making violence, and law-bending violence. And the avenger can hide behind the Law to reap surplus enjoyment in practicing evil and executing boundless revenge.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1754-6095
Print ISSN
1947-4644
Pages
pp. 59-77
Launched on MUSE
2014-01-03
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.