Abstract

This paper introduces the term “structural coercion” to underscore the ways in which broader social, economic, and political contexts act upon individuals to compel them to enroll as subjects in clinical research. The paper challenges the adequacy of the concepts of “coercion” and “undue influence” in determining when research participation is voluntary. Acknowledging structural coercion shifts the frame of ethical deliberation away from specific individuals and specific studies to see important patterns in research participation by salient demographic characteristics. The effects of structural coercion manifest themselves in particular research settings, but unlike the conventional form of coercion, it is not rooted in the researcher–participant relationship or linked to particular study protocols. By extracting voluntariness from entrenched conceptions of the researcher–participant dyad, this paper proposes approaches to minimize the effects of structural coercion while creating new ethical imaginaries for review boards and researchers alike.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3249
Print ISSN
1054-6863
Pages
pp. 355-379
Launched on MUSE
2013-12-23
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.