Abstract

The story of how historians of women and gender do class—the neglected component of intersectionality—takes the form of a return narrative. Connected to trends in the global political economy, class has reemerged as a category of analysis, with interpretative returns that are worth it. But what constitutes class and its boundaries is not so apparent. Here I reflect on three broad arenas: First, how do we define class: is women’s class the same as men’s? Second, what constitutes class formation: How has gender functioned in understandings of class and class mobilization? Third, what is meant by labor: how has women’s history expanded definitions of work and worker and how has such scholarship understood the significance of reproductive labor for the overall political economy? Commodities, we have learned, can be gendered and indeed have a sex, even if women’s class remains determined differently than men’s.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1527-2036
Print ISSN
1042-7961
Pages
pp. 74-87
Launched on MUSE
2013-12-18
Open Access
No
Archive Status
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.