In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

What 80 Million Women Want (1913) 65 min. b&w What 80 million women want in 1913 is the right to vote, and this film was produced as a campaign movie for the women's suffrage movement. It combines documentary footage of the movement with a fictional account of an office romance. Unfortunately, despite an occasional glimpse ofEmeline Pankhurst, the dominant message is thoroughly garbled in a confusing, paternalistic script. The film focuses on Mabel West who temporarily is forced to forego the love of her ardent admirer, Will Travers, for the sake of "the cause". But love, justice and women's suffrage are ultimately vindicated when the urban political machine is overthrown, the corrupt party bosses (including a black manager) are heaved intojail, and Mabel accepts Will's offer of holy matrimony. Beyond the weak plot, the film remains an interesting and informative document ofthe change in the women's movement from an inclusive radical protest for equal rights to an exclusive preoccupation with the right to vote as a categorical panacea for world evil. The film is available from the Film Classic Exchange. Its immediate historical relevance is self-evident. (Course, America in the 20th Century) Richard D. Schubart, State University of New York at Binghamton SOURCE NOTES This regular department ofFilm & History seeks to pass along suggestionsfor sources offilm and ideasfor using it effectively. THE SLADE FILM HISTORY REGISTER By Frances Thorpe Project Director It would be interesting to know when and where film was first used as a serious part of a History course in a British university. Film curators and librarians seem to have realized the value and potential oftheir medium some time ago, vice articles by ARBAUGH and BARRY (Film & History Bibliography p. 1) and a quotation from Ernest Lindgren's letter to 'The Times' 14.4.1969 "The National Film Archive also has a large collection of historical film reaching back to 1895 which we should like to see more wide] y used, and where greater demand would help us to press for more viewing and study facilities". Historians, together with their fellow academics in the humanities, seem to have neglected this valuable research and teaching resource until very recently for a number of complex reasons. References to the cinema or to specific films are rarely to be found in twentieth century history books and one wonders, in 1972, what percentage of the 100+ History courses now being taught in Britain include screenings as an integral part of the educational process. David Adams, writing in University Vision (no. 1 Feb .1968 p. 15) admits that "when the American Studies programme at Keele began we did not use film". He also quotes from an essay in American Studies in Transition (Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1964, ed. M.W. Fishwick) "the motion 97 ...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
p. 97
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.