In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Crime & Punishment in Istanbul, 1700-1800
  • Bruce Masters
Fariba Zarinebaf , Crime & Punishment in Istanbul, 1700-1800. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 2010. Pp. xiii, 287. $22.95 paper.

Historians of the Ottoman Empire often characterize the eighteenth century as a period of transition between the early modern and the modern periods. This is especially true of those who write about the empire's capital and its largest city, Istanbul. Fariba Zarinebaf has chosen to discuss crime and punishment in the city over the course of the eighteenth century to illustrate how Istanbul's underworld and the state's attempts to control it changed as Ottoman society began to show signs of tentative modernity. Along the way, through the use of extensive comparative examples the author seeks to establish that the transition from the old order to the new was not so different from that occurring in Mediterranean Europe, especially in France. Relying on a growing body of literature on crime and punishment in the provincial centers of the Ottoman Empire, she also draws interesting contrasts between the ways in which justice was administered in the capital and in the provinces. In short, there is much in this work that historians of both early modern Europe and the Ottoman Empire will find interesting and instructive.

Istanbul was perhaps the most cosmopolitan seaport on the Mediterranean in the eighteenth century. Within it lived a diverse population drawn from the myriad ethnic and religious communities of the Ottoman Empire, with each religious community subject to its own laws and courts. Zarinebaf is particularly adept at delineating the city's complex social structure, highlighting the creation of the underclass that provided most of the perpetrators of breaches of law and order. Due to the diversity of religious communities, and the presence of a large number of resident Europeans and their protégées who in most cases were exempt from Islamic legal traditions, there were multiple layers of legal systems in operation as well as several different arms of law enforcement. Overseeing all were the representatives of the sultan. One of this work's strengths is its discussion of the major role those at the imperial court played in maintaining order and dispensing justice, which was often accomplished in ways that did not conform to Islamic legal traditions. The Ottoman state allowed Muslim legal scholars to set the boundaries of morality for society, but it generally chose to punish violations of that code in its own way.

With justice and punishment being dispensed by various bodies in Istanbul, the paper trail left in Ottoman archival collections is diverse, ranging from the records of the Islamic courts to police reports and the registers for the imperial galleys, on which many of those convicted were condemned to serve. Zarinebaf is to be commended for consulting a wide-ranging variety of sources in order to provide a guide to the complexities of the systems that governed and sought to control social order in Istanbul. There are sufficient details in some of the galley registers for the author to present intriguing, if brief, glimpses of the Ottoman underworld. In other examples, however, the laconic nature of the sources compels her to provide her own suppositions about the circumstances of a particular case, which may or may not be valid. As a result, the narratives of crimes and punishment are at times uneven.

Although I learned much from this work, the organization the author employs in setting out her discussion detracts from the story she tells. Crime is reduced to a typology in which various categories of offenses—e.g., crimes against [End Page 641] property, prostitution and vice, violence and homicide—are each given a chapter, with a few examples from across the century to illustrate each particular crime. Having discussed those types of crimes, the author then offers chapters on the multiple legal systems present in the city and methods of punishment. The presentation would have been more satisfying if the discussions of justice and punishment had come first, illustrated by embedded examples of various crimes and the punishment meted out to the wrongdoers. The narrative is also hurt by editing that left many typographical...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 641-642
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.