Abstract

This article reports on a study of civic discourse in online political forums. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law in the United States after heated debate. Some of the debate took place online, often in political forums. This study describes and analyzes the information used to frame and support participants’ opinions within the online environment. Researchers collected 6,322 postings in 226 threads over thirteen months in three discussion boards (two moderated and one unmoderated). Using citation context analysis and citation content analysis, researchers identified the type of sources used by posters (i.e., those individuals who post information online), the quality of such sources, and the responses of other posters to source use. Sources were categorized based on type and coded based on neutrality and authority. The category of most-cited sources was newspapers and newswires. While the majority of postings did not use sources (over 97 percent did not cite any source), of those sources coded (n = 460), over a third were clearly biased and/or unauthoritative. The authors discuss some of the difficulties individuals face in finding and using political information. Recommendations are made for developing national information policy, improving the format of information channels, and designing user education and services to support civic discourse.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1559-0682
Print ISSN
0024-2594
Pages
pp. 497-521
Launched on MUSE
2012-03-30
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.