Abstract

In a response to Carey and Reynold’s “Comparing the Arab Revolts: The Impact of Election Systems,” Timothy Meisburger argues that in the special case of developing or emerging democracies, PR may not be the most appropriate election system, and that majoritarian or plurality systems may do a better job of ensuring effective representation and promoting democratization. He asserts that while PR may be a good choice for the mature democracies of northern Europe which already have such key prerequisites as parties with clear ideological profiles, well-defined platforms, and democratic internal-governance rules, emerging democracies might be better off with a system that is more likely to aid the development of democratic attitudes and the emergence of fully democratic parties and states.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3214
Print ISSN
1045-5736
Pages
pp. 155-163
Launched on MUSE
2012-01-13
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.