In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 49.3 (2003) iii-vii



[Access article in PDF]

Editorial


Merrill-Palmer Quarterly Objectives

A principal objective for Merrill-Palmer Quarterly during this editorial term is to maintain the standards of excellence established by the past Editor, Dr. Carolyn U. Shantz, and continue to advance the scope and quality of scholarship that appears in the journal. This aim has been at the forefront of Merrill-Palmer Quarterly's nearly 50 years of existence, and as a result, the journal's readership, submission rates, and scholarly reputation have grown substantially. MPQ is now ranked among the most respected journals in the human developmental sciences (see Rushton & Roediger, 1978; Feingold, 1989; and Howard & Day, 1995, see p. 141). Another objective is to expand the scope of the journal's content so as to embrace diverse academic disciplines, research contexts and paradigms, and geo-political perspectives, while also refining its mission by featuring articles in which authors initiate important new areas of inquiry, transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries, and introduce conceptual, methodological, and analytic innovations. Toward this end, the Editors seek to establish a format for the journal that is diverse with respect to contributors' and readers' scientific disciplines, professional status (junior versus senior investigators), ethnicity and cultural backgrounds, and geo-political contexts or locations. Included in this aim is the goal of publishing contributions from a global community of scholars; the Editors encourage submissions from investigators who reside or work in countries other than the USA and Canada.

Merrill-Palmer Quarterly's Substantive Focus

Merrill-Palmer Quarterly's mission is to serve as a primary source of new research studies in human development, theoretical papers, critical reviews of literature, and scholarly commentaries. The purview of Merrill-Palmer Quarterly encompasses theory and research on all areas of child and adolescent development, and incorporates the journal's historical commitment to the study of development in context (e.g., sociocultural variations, families, schools, neighborhoods, peers, media, etc.). The majority of papers that are considered for Merrill-Palmer Quarterly are original reports of empirical research that extend knowledge about child and adolescent development. The Editors are primarily interested in submissions that advance development theory and generate novel findings from [End Page iii] sound developmental methods and designs. Also preferred are empirical investigations that contain provocative aims, multiple studies, and innovative methods. In contrast, articles that are focused on technical issues (e.g., creation and evaluation of measures, methods, statistical analyses, etc.) are of lesser interest unless they also contain an original substantive (developmental) component and contribution. This same restriction applies to investigations that do not include infants, children, or adolescents as participants. Examples would include investigations conducted on undergraduates, adults, or parents/parenting that do not also contain child data.

Creation of Special Sections or Special Issues

Aspects of Merrill-Palmer Quarterly's mission may, at times, be complemented by devoting journal space to special sections and special issues. Proposals for special sections or issues may be submitted for consideration and, if encouraged, development in collaboration with the Editors. Those interested in developing a special issue or section should contact the Editor for additional information. As illustrations, special sections or issues might be focused on topics or areas of investigation that: (a) bring novel perspectives and findings to bear on existing research traditions or literatures, (b) address emergent and/or controversial issues within and/or across disciplines, (c) are of growing international importance, (d) are of particular interest to specific cultural, ethnic, or national groups.

Manuscript Review Process

The Editors of Merrill-Palmer Quarterly aspire to provide authors with high-quality peer reviews and constructive, decisive, decision letters in a timely manner. Further information about the manuscript review process is provided in the paragraphs that follow.

Implementation of Blind Review. The Editors of Merrill-Palmer Quarterly have changed the journal's peer review policy to that of blind peer review. Thus, only manuscripts that have been prepared for blind peer review can be considered for publication.

Role, nature, and number of peer reviews. Peer reviewers will continue to play an important advisory role in the evaluation of manuscript submissions, and the Editors will solicit reviews from colleagues who...

pdf

Share