In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The Catholic Historical Review 89.2 (2003) 333-334

[Access article in PDF]
Le Cardinal Liénart: Évêque de Lille, 1928-1968. By Catherine Masson. (Paris: Éditions du Cerf. 2001. Pp. 769. 250 FF.)

Once again an historian of Catholic France has written a biography of a significant church figure in the grand style of a magnum opus. In this instance the choice fell upon one of the two most significant transitional cardinals of the twentieth-century French church, Achille Liénart. The other acknowledged leader, of course, is Emmanuel Suhard, the cardinal archbishop of Paris whose brief tenure at his see (1940-1949) witnessed an explosion of Catholic creativity—clandestine chaplains, missionary parishes, a pluralistic press, a revived specialized Catholic Action, the Mission de France seminary, and the worker-priest movement. Suhard's noted career emerges in yet another magnum opus, that of Father Jean Vinatier, who himself was active in these vital French Catholic renovations. Indeed, Vinatier had written an earlier book on Cardinal Liénart, Le Cardinal Liénart et la Mission de France, but as the title indicates it focuses on the bishop of Lille's specific relationship with the troubled Mission de France and its seminary. Hence the vast biography of Cardinal Liénart by his niece Catherine Masson proves to be a most welcome addition to our knowledge of the twentieth-century French Catholic church as well as providing us with the definitive biography of this great prelate.

Although one might sustain a degree of skepticism with respect to a biography written by a beloved family member, Catherine Masson presents a most convincing and balanced account. To be sure, she writes from a Christian perspective and does not hide her admiration for the cardinal, but this exhaustive [End Page 333] work is no hagiography. Cardinal Liénart's contradictions and blinders appear in this biography. They are explained, but they are not explained away. That she displays her own analysis is to be expected, and even where one might challenge her conclusions she makes a convincing case. In his attitude toward the Communists Liénart carried his suspicions, perhaps, without sufficient nuances. At the same time, as Masson points out, he was no simplistic foe of the local Marxists and their organizations. He remained in dialogue with them and sustained the loyalty of every one of his worker-priests even when they were disappointed in him. His embarrassing silence with respect to treatment of the Jews during the German Occupation receives sufficient attention, but the full depths of anti-Judaism within the Church await more analysis which likely will cast more shame on the cardinal. His behavior, in spite of political limitations, appeared tawdry in light of such figures as Cardinals Saliège and Gerlier.

Nonetheless, the heroic figure who strides across major changes in France and within its church emerges as most convincing in Dr. Masson's work. Her portrayal of a pious, conservative figure compelled by his faith to be a pastor in a changing world rings true. His courage in the trenches, the loyalty he inspired, his commitment to working-class justice and specialized Catholic Action, his relationship with clerical and lay leaders, his capacity for dialogue and his openness to Vatican Council II combine to make him a compelling figure. Catherine Masson has achieved her goal admirably in her presentation of a French Catholic leader of faith and integrity who straddled a radically changing church with creativity and vision in his four-decade episcopate.


Oscar Cole-Arnal
Waterloo Lutheran Seminary
Waterloo, Ontario



Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 333-334
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.