In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Modern Judaism 23.2 (2003) 126-155



[Access article in PDF]

"We're Not Jews":
Imagining Jewish History and Jewish Bodies in Contemporary Multicultural Literature

Sander L. Gilman


Multiculturalism and the Jews

By the end of the twentieth century a new frontier had come into being on which Jews were imagined to have a special function. That new frontier was called multiculturalism, and it defined itself quite literally in terms of real or perceived boundaries. It was, according to contemporary self-defined multicultural thinkers such as Gloria Anzaldúa, the space where "this mixture of races, rather than resulting in an inferior being, provides hybrid progeny, a mutable, more malleable species with a rich gene pool." 1 Contemporary multicultural theory provides a further rehabilitation of notions of continually crossing ideas of race at the frontier. The Canadian filmmaker Christine Welsh effects a similar, necessary rehabilitation of the anxiety about being Métis, of mixed race: the Métis becomes one type on the Canadian frontier. 2 By positing the "cosmic race" as "healing the split at the foundation of our lives," she removes the stigmata of illness from those at the borderlands.

And yet the multicultural is also the antithesis of hybridity. It can just as frequently be the reification and commodification of ethnic identity. It may stress the boundaries and borders among ethnic, cultural, religious, or class groups. If the Métis is hybrid, then hip-hop is multicultural. (And "world music" can be both!) Although multiculturalism can allow for and indeed celebrate the merging of cultures so as to eliminate boundaries, one of its strongest claims (in the new global culture that is both hybrid and multicultural) is its insistence that each of us has a "culture" in a concrete ethnic or class sense and that the products of these cultures can be displayed, sold, consumed, and exchanged across borders. More importantly, central to both models of [End Page 126] multiculturalism is that culture is the basis for our identities. Biological difference, the difference of the older and some of the present views of race, is displaced onto a symbolic cultural level. But at the same moment, this cultural heritage is commodified and, thus, made available for all consumers.

In such a world, how do writers who self-consciously see themselves as multicultural members of a clearly delineated group (ethnic, social, religious), or see themselves as inherently hybrid of such groups, imagine minorities such as Jews? Recently there has been an explosion of studies on this topic, contrasting African American images of Jews and Jewish American images of blacks. 3 And yet this multicultural theme seems to have its limits in emphasizing the boundaries between the groups rather than the possibility of hybridity (to be found, for example, in the intertwined history of jazz and klezmer in the United States). But is multiculturalism an American problem? What groups count as multicultural? What happens when this project is extended beyond the blacks–Jews paradigm and beyond the borders of the United States? What happens when other groups are brought into the discussion of multiculturalism? And what happens when it crosses national, even linguistic, boundaries? What happens when a writer self-consciously representing her or his work as the voice of a multicultural writer needs to define difference? The reception of these works is often very much in line with the self-definition of the author. The specific subject position of the text is seen as part of the fiction itself. Each multicultural text takes as one of its themes the creation of a multicultural voice in the novel, whether it is that of the narrator or of the protagonist. It labels itself as functioning on the imagined frontier of the multicultural.

In many of these multicultural texts, the figure of the Jew, defined within the world of the fiction, is a key to understanding the very nature of the multicultural society represented. This figure takes on different contours based on the existing stereotypes within each culture and each ethnic cohort. The core concepts that shape the image of...

pdf

Share