Abstract

This essay questions the assumption, in contemporary scholarship as well as nineteenth-century literary criticism, that domestic fiction must be associated with femininity in general, and with women writers specifically. In David Copperfield, Dickens is attempting to create a masculine version of the domestic novel by writing a novel about a male writer who successfully transforms domestic space into economic space, while retaining the domestic novel’s traditional association with moral uplift. Dickens is claiming that a man can write a better domestic novel than a woman can, which provokes his contemporaries as well as ours into accusing Dickens of gender confusion: both have a habit of calling Dickens “effeminate.” The violence of these reactions should lead us to question the role of the male writer in the nineteenth century.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1522-9270
Print ISSN
0039-3657
Pages
pp. 811-829
Launched on MUSE
2010-12-03
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.