In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Bulletin of the History of Medicine 77.1 (2003) 218-219

[Access article in PDF]
David T. Courtwright. Dark Paradise: A History of Opiate Addiction in America. Enlarged edition of Dark Paradise: A History of Opiate Addiction in America before 1940 (1982). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001. xv + 326 pp. Ill. $22.95 (paperbound, 0-674-00585-6).

The ambivalence of our agonistic romance with these chemical compounds is captured in the very title of this foundational text in the field of drug policy history. David Courtwright has marshaled a wealth of knowledge, demographic evidence, and extensive archival research for the present enlarged edition, which contains a preface and two post-1940 chapters that narrate the decentering of opiate addiction as the main driver of U.S. drug policy. Enriched by ethnographic work accomplished since the original publication, as well as by Courtwright's familiarity with the new generation of drug policy historians, the book maps out the current conceptual and political terrain on which the theoretical and empirical contentions of drug policy history abound. Himself a founding figure of the field, Courtwright examines the nagging question of why neither conservative nor liberal reform proposals have really taken hold despite widespread agreement that the policy is a "failure." The meaning of the political appellations of Left and Right has changed rapidly in the world of drug policy, and drug policy historians would do well to dispense with such problematic labels rather than inhabit them once they are evacuated of sense.

Although Dark Paradise is by no means polemic, it is difficult if not impossible to contribute to drug policy history without staking a political position on current policy, which is no longer as tethered to the criminalization-medicalization continuum nor as stably centered around opiate (heroin) addiction as it was throughout the early to mid-twentieth century. To Courtwright's credit he provides a clear account of his own position as a deconstructive critic of both "liberal" and "conservative" camps, stating his support of legal maintenance for confirmed addicts without playing into legalization rhetoric. As a social historian [End Page 218] he grants more credence to changes in clinical practice and demographic shifts in the addicted population than would diplomatic or legal historians. The central mystery of why a policy widely considered a fiscal and political failure would be so difficult to shift pragmatically and would acquire such a "reactionary tone" (p. 179) by the end of the twentieth century remains a touchstone throughout the book.

History is always about the present. This well-argued analytic history synthesizes two significant lessons, both of which have their value as heuristics as well as their pitfalls. The first argument can be summarized as "epidemiology recapitulates etiology": the idea that geographic availability, cultural contexts that encourage use, and sheer exposure to opiates are the best predictors of opiate addiction (p. 6). Courtwright backs up this claim with historical demography of the highest order, supplemented by ample qualitative data. Yet his reduction of etiology to epidemiology can also bear critical scrutiny. While the struggle to render epidemiology scientific has succeeded since its mid-century deployment as a more speculative science, historians of science and medicine should not forget that "epidemic" narratives function as models or metaphors designed to make sense of large-scale patterns of statistical risk and occurrence. Population-based themes echo throughout much of Courtwright's work, including Violent Land: Single Men and Social Disorder from the Frontier to the Inner City (1996). Sex ratios are complex—they are produced by, as well as productive of, the complex behaviors and attitudes that undergird the "propensities" toward violence exhibited among American men. As a social historian, Courtwright deftly captures that fine-grained complexity in his narrative, and the archival and qualitative sources drive him toward it. Yet his wholesale adoption of the epidemic metaphor binds his analysis to its historical moment in somewhat limiting ways.

The second major contribution underlines Courtwright's well-known and elegantly argued thesis that the transformation of the modal American addict from upper- and middle-class white...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 218-219
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.