In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

The OJ Simpson Interview Video Tape | Halevy Drew Philip Halevy University of Arkansas The OJ. Simpson Interview Videotape (VHS Videotape 139 minutes, H&K, LLC, 1996; $ 39.95) he O.J. Simpson "defense" tape is interesting, and not only for what is said on it. If we overlook the need for money (which Simpson readily admits at the beginning of the tape), the video is an interesting commentary, since a man who was acquitted of all charges feels compelled to redefend himself in the arena of public opinion. More importantly, the tape became a subject of great controversy when Simpson found himself unable to market the product through obvious outlets. In the crudest cut of all, even the National Enquirer, which made millions of dollars from the Simpson case, refused to carry ads for the tape. The program itself is somewhat of disappointment, as there are no shocking revelations by Simpson. The tape is however, a very good and probing interview carried out by journalist Ross Becker. At the beginning of the interview, Becker states that the only limitations on the interview were that he could not ask questions about Simpson's children ,Simpson's finances, or post-trial lawsuits. The program is in two parts. The first section is the interview between Becker and Simpson. In the second section , Simpson conducts a tour of his home and grounds. (He does so to dispute some of the claims made by the prosecution during the trial. We even get to go out to the curb where the Bronco was parked so "carelessly" on the night of the murder.) Throughout the interview, Ross Becker is unwilling to accept Simpson's answers at face value, and instead asks probing follow ups, at times pushing Simpson to defend his position. All the hype and controversy aside, it is a thoughtful , well-conducted interview. Becker states at the beginning of the tape that he kept a copy for himself, so that Simpson could not distort the substance of the exchange during postproduction . An example of Becker's persistence is seen in the issue ofblood evidence. When pressed on this crucial topic, Simpson tries to finesse the answers by claiming that he does not think that it is his blood that was found in the Ford Bronco. Becker keeps pushing the defendant to be more specific—on this question and others. On the family side of the story, Simpson gives an insight into his life with Nicole Brown Simpson, and spends a great deal oftime refuting the media images ofhis "abusive" marriage to Nicole. Simpson also points out many of the inconsistencies in the prosecution's argument. Toward the conclusion of the tape, Simpson gives a strong indictment ofhow his tragedy has been reported, especially by the media. He argues that the media presented rumors and conjectures as fact; in his own mind, he has been denied a forum in which to defend himself—hence, the importance ofthis tape as a way to the American public around the existing networks. He also makes pointed references to criticism that he has tried to make money offthe trial (through the sale of this tape) and yet no one seems to criticize Marcia Clark or Fay Resnek for their books and profits. There is a shortage ofbenchmarks with which one can measure the value of this tape. The closest example is the Dianne Sawyer interview with Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Sawyer was widely criticized for interviewing Jackson and Presley with kid gloves and accepting their answers at face value. In sharp contrast, Ross Becker's Vol. 25, No. 1-2, 1995 | 65 Halevy | The OJ Simpson Interview Video Tape questions pushed Simpson many times over key points; certainly, the first half of the tape does not coddle the witness. The tape provides an interesting commentary on both our legal system and American culture. The jury system portrayed in the film Twelve Angry Men has given way to a media circus where no one seems in control. It is no longer truth that is of the highest value, but the shock value of the story that can be sold to the highest bidder. Tabloids such as the National Enquirer made...

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1548-9922
Print ISSN
0360-3695
Pages
pp. 65-66
Launched on MUSE
2013-01-02
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.