In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Byron Society of America Session:'Byron and the Revolutionary Spirit' 28 December 2009 Modern Language Association Conference Philadelphia
  • Andrew Stauffer

At the 2009 Modern Language Association conference in Philadelphia, Paul Douglass (San Jose State) presided over the conference's first Byron Society of America session, entitled 'Byron and the Revolutionary Spirit'. The session was particularly well-attended, drawing a standing-room-only crowd. Charles Mahoney (Connecticut) spoke first on 'Promethean Innovation: Byron's Lyrics to Augusta'. This paper offered a bold new reading of the Augusta poems of 1816-17 as marked by Promethean imagery of fidelity, bondage and endurance, suggesting Augusta's role as the catalyst for a new stage in Byron's poetic career. This period has often been recognised as a creative watershed for Byron, but Mahoney advanced this line of thought by showing the centrality of the poet's imaginings of Augusta to the changes it brought about. Madeleine Callaghan (Durham) then delivered an excellent paper that challenged the conventional opposition of Byron and the Lake School poets, suggesting, via Hazlitt, that Byron shared many poetic preoccupations with Wordsworth, among them the power of memory to construct the self and the relationship of imaginative work to fame. Next, Timothy Webb (Bristol), the winner of this year's Keats-Shelley Association Distinguished Scholar award, spoke on 'Byron and Irish Nationalism', offering a subtle and revealing reading of Byron's allusions to the Irish question, particularly in his Whiggish parliamentary speech on Catholic claims and in a note on the founding of the college at Maynooth. Webb thus demonstrated the complex texture of Irish sympathy in Byron's work. Finally, Noah Comet (Ohio State) delivered a thought-provoking paper on Byron and Hemans, with specific attention to Hemans' poem Modern Greece. Comet was particularly interested in the contradictions in these poets' thinking about how Greece or Greeks (an important distinction) might still be free. The Greeks, after all, were a flawed and human group of moderns clamouring for freedom from Turkish rule, while Greece was an ideal, trans-historical concept that might be given new life via the efforts of poets. Only a brief space of time remained for questions after these [End Page 76] four rich presentations, but attendees left with a renewed sense of the complexities of Byron's work and its engagement with the spirits of revolution, poetic, political and personal. [End Page 77]

Andrew Stauffer
University of Virginia
...

pdf

Share