Reviewed by:
Jack Williams E 40°: An Interpretive Atlas Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2006. 248 pages, photographs, maps, plans, diagrams. ISBN 978-0-8139-2524-0, $30.00 PB

The enigmatic title of E 40° is a geographic reference: E 40° is the angle from true north of the Appalachian Mountains as they run from Alabama to Maine. Jack Williams uses the line of the mountains as a spatial and geographic armature to link studies of five sets of towns: courthouse towns of Alabama; river, wagon, and railroad towns of Alabama; soft-coal towns of West Virginia and Kentucky; hard-coal towns of Pennsylvania; and fishing and boat-building towns of Maine. Each set of towns is tied in its own way to the mountains and to the resources that each exploited in its development and heyday. Each also has a distinct and concise plan, usually gridded, that results from the specific circumstances of geography, transportation, and resource extraction. It is this relationship between town plan and geographic and cultural circumstances that is the focus of the book.

The subtitle of the book, An Interpretive Atlas, while more mundane, is more informative of its actual content. Simply defined, an atlas is a bound volume of maps and diagrams, and E 40° is a map-based interpretation and analysis of the various sets of towns. Some of the maps are historical, including maps of early transportation routes, bird's-eye views of the towns, and Sanborn maps of streets and their surrounding buildings. Others were made for the purposes of this investigation, including figure-ground drawings, street plan diagrams, and composite maps of buildings, street grids, railroads, waterways, and topography. Though relatively conventional types of maps, they are beautiful and clear representations of the towns' structure, and they make Williams's assessment of the relationships between the geography of the Appalachians and the urban structure of the towns very believable. Indeed, the book is so graphically engaging that it is hard not to just flip through it, looking at the pictures, before reading the text. In doing so, many of the relationships between topography, resources, and transportation are evident from a preliminary visual survey.

The graphic interpretation is accompanied by well-written narrative accounts of the historical and geographic circumstances that led to the towns' settlement and prosperity. The narratives are further illustrated with historical photographs, showing the towns as places of social engagement and thriving commerce. Though it would be easy to romanticize life in them, the text and photographs acknowledge the hardships of life there: the oppressive racial segregation in Alabama, the drudgery of work in the mines, and the potential perils of working on the sea.

Though each town has its own history and [End Page 118] geography, commonalities between them led to distinct patterns of settlement within each geographic region. At the southern end of the Appalachians, the courthouse towns of Alabama were the social and cultural centers of each county. They were geographically centered in their respective counties and were equally spaced within a day's carriage ride, so that judges could easily negotiate the circuit of courts within their jurisdiction. The river, wagon, and railroad towns in Alabama were the urban centers in an agrarian landscape and were sited where topography allowed a meeting of farm products and transportation networks. In West Virginia and Kentucky, where the land is deeply dissected by rivers, the steep, narrow valleys constricted development of both railroads and towns in remote locations adjacent to bituminous coal seams. The figure-ground drawings of these towns appear as constellations spreading in seemingly random directions as they follow stream courses and small valleys. By contrast, the anthracite coal towns of central Pennsylvania formed with long, tight, rectangular grids, sandwiched between parallel ridges of the Appalachians and constrained on their ends by the adjacent coal mines, located within walking distance of the miners' homes. The coastal towns of Maine formed in response to the conditions of their harbors with streets radiating from the center or running perpendicular to the shoreline. They are the only towns in this study that formed without conspicuous grids of streets.

Understanding this relationship between geography, culture, and town form is at the center of Williams's argument that concise urban form is a fundamentally more sustainable means of settlement than today's sprawling suburban development. By this he means both ecological sustainability and cultural sustainability in reference to the towns' role as repositories of social interaction and cultural memory. As appealing as this argument is to one who also has a fondness for the Appalachian region and to small towns in general, it is problematic in ways that Williams himself acknowledges. Most of these towns prospered in their day due to very exploitative relationships with the land that were fundamentally unsustainable. Consequently many of them no longer have viable economies and are dying, unless like the towns in Maine, they have managed to draw upon their physical charms to become tourist destinations. For all their visual appeal and concise urban form, they seem to be the antithesis of ecological sustainability. Without an economic base, they also seem to be culturally unsustainable, although as "cisterns of culture" (219) they do indeed carry a legacy of the lives of those who toiled in the mines, on the sea, and in the fields of the Appalachian region.

At various points in the text, Williams references the Civil War and especially the battle at Gettysburg where soldiers from Camden, Alabama and Camden, Maine fought each other at Little Round Top. This historical coincidence gives Williams a nice narrative thread, but it also points to another potential level of interpretation that lies unmined beneath the surface of his analysis. Williams notes that many of these towns commemorated their Civil War dead with a statue of a soldier with downturned eyes, often in a park or at a critical junction in the town's plan. In a figure-ground drawing, elements like Civil War statues often are rendered invisible, relegated to the "ground," which is depicted merely as blank paper. One wonders what other representations of cultural memory, what other social and cultural stories are told in these towns' urban form but are also muted by the particular maps collected and made for this atlas. Williams' histories of these towns and the historical images he includes tantalize with their narrative content, yet little of that is actually readable in the maps. For all of their clarity, the maps seem to silence much of the civic detail of these towns, detail that perhaps is as much a cistern of culture as are the town plans themselves. How these towns represent their particular history and geography within their civic structure might prove to be more informative, more translatable to other settlements, and more culturally sustainable than their street plans. It makes one yearn for more information and more thorough interpretation of their form.

But that of course would mean a different book. Atlases usually cast their nets wide rather than deep, and E 40° follows in that tradition. By including as many examples as he does, Williams establishes a framework for comparison within each region and all along the Appalachian Mountains. In doing so, he brings little-known towns out of the shadows of the mountains and into the light of wider geographic and cultural discourse. Hopefully others will follow in his footsteps and pursue in more depth the issues that he introduces in this broad, interpretive atlas. [End Page 119]

Paul Kelsch

Paul Kelsch is associate professor in the Department of Landscape Architecture at the Washington Alexandria Architecture Center. He has professional degrees in architecture and landscape architecture and a Ph.D. in cultural geography. His research focuses on the cultural construction of nature and its expression in designed landscapes, specifically looking at the interrelationships between ecological understandings of nature and discourses of nature grounded in landscape history, art, experience, and social theory. These issues come to bear especially in urban forestry projects and community relationships with nature.

Share