Abstract

Over the course of the twentieth century, Victorian narrative painting became synonymous with sentimentality, melodrama, and the artificial evocation of emotion. This essay aims to complicate this familiar assessment by examining the role emotional effect played in aesthetic evaluations of some of the most popular modern life genre paintings of the 1850s to 1870s. I argue that the critical discourse on Victorian narrative painting was marked by a persistent skepticism about the role of feeling in aesthetic response—as excessively painful or obvious emotional impact marked the limit between artistic success and failure—and I locate these concerns within the physical and social exhibition culture of the Royal Academy.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1527-2052
Print ISSN
0042-5222
Pages
pp. 457-469
Launched on MUSE
2009-08-15
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.