Abstract

This paper is a critical review of Antonio R. Damasio's recent book Descartes' Error. It is argued that although the book succeeds in showing how the emotions play a necessary role in reasoning processes, it fails in its attempt to shed new light on the mind-brain problem. It is further argued that this last failure could perhaps have been avoided if Damasio had allowed the philosophy of the French phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty to inform his own thinking.

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3303
Print ISSN
1071-6076
Pages
pp. 337-341
Launched on MUSE
1998-12-01
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.