In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • War Horse: A History of the Military Horse and Rider
  • Catharine R. Franklin
War Horse: A History of the Military Horse and Rider. By Louis A. DiMarco. Yardley, Pa.: Westholme Publishing, 2007. ISBN 978-159416-034-9. Maps. Illustrations. Tables. Appendix. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xii, 415. $29.95.

The horse has been the silent partner of soldiers in war since ancient times. Although he was replaced by weapons systems that reflected the evolution of military technology, the horse proved to be the most flexible and mobile asset available to armies for more than thirty centuries. Horses did more than bear their masters – they participated in battle, biting and kicking both human and equine foes; they instilled fear with their tremendous bulk and speed. As LTC DiMarco so ably demonstrates in War Horse, an army's ability to manage horses often determined the outcome of entire campaigns. The mobility, mass, and shock effect of cavalry proved fundamental to military operations from the reign of the Egyptian pharaohs until the Second World War. While the employment of horses in war has been treated elsewhere, this text distinguishes itself as a truly comprehensive study of the military horse.

Emphasizing the crucial role played by mounted forces, DiMarco offers several nuanced interpretations of battles where cavalry played a key role, such as Hattin, Waterloo, and Gettysburg. At Waterloo, for instance, "the perfect timing and aggressiveness" of British cavalry altered the dynamics of the battle (p. 228). The author also considers the ability of armies to breed quality stock, maintain the health of their horses, and ensure that soldiers know the fundamentals of horsemanship. Furthermore, he argues that the psychology of horse and rider must be taken into account—for if horses are overtaken by fear as a group, it can prove difficult to regain control of them, as evinced by the rout of Roman cavalry at Andrianopole.

Of particular interest to American military historians will be DiMarco's analysis of European and American cavalry in the nineteenth century. During the Civil War, the ability of Union soldiers to play both offensive and defensive roles meant that they were as effective as their European counterparts, and thus developed their full potential. Only in the analysis of Plains Indian horsemanship does the text show any limitations, ascribing "a large ignorance of events beyond the local region" to native people (p. 274). More accurately, trade networks and kinship connections made it possible, for example, for Dakota Indians in Minnesota to have long-standing relationships with other native people as far north as Winnepeg in Canada.

Notwithstanding these minor objections, however, War Horse is an excellent book. In addition to its coverage of military topics, it explores the physical characteristics of horse breeds, the training of horses and riders, and the evolution of horsemanship. Historians of both ancient and modern warfare will find this text of interest, as it attests to the complexity of cavalry actions and considers current [End Page 624] trends in military history. Those who love horses will, like this reviewer, be heartened by the book's focus on the horse and the author's steadfast assertion of the horse's selfless service in war.

Catharine R. Franklin
University of Oklahoma
Norman, Oklahoma


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 624-625
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Archive Status
Archived 2010
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.