In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Death of the Wehrmacht: The German Campaigns of 1942
  • Richard L. DiNardo
Death of the Wehrmacht: The German Campaigns of 1942. By Robert M. Citino. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007. ISBN 978-0-700-61531-5. Maps. Photographs. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xiv, 431. $34.95.

The author describes this book as a sequel to his previous book, The German Way of War. Surveying the breadth of Prussian and German military history, Robert Citino argues that the German way of war was marked by a preference for short wars, culminating in a decisive battle of annihilation. This required a military led by aggressive, offensively spirited officers and a tolerance of independent decision making by subordinate commanders. In Death of the Wehrmacht, Citino looks at the campaigns in Russia and North Africa in 1942, the outcomes of which doomed the German Army and its way of war.

After recounting Germany's successes from 1939-1941, Citino examines the campaigns in southern Russia and North Africa in considerable detail. May 1942 victories in the Crimea, Sevastopol and the Izyum bulge, marked by large bags of prisoners, seemed to confirm German martial superiority over the Red Army. The month closed with Erwin Rommel's offensive against the British Gazala line in North Africa extending into the June seizure of Tobruk.

While spring 1942 was dazzling, the summer was just the opposite. The summer offensive in southern Russia, planned by Adolf Hitler and his General Staff Chief Franz Halder, aimed at seizing the Caucasus oil fields, failed in its attempt to encircle and destroy Soviet forces west of the Don River, and ultimately became enmeshed in the maelstrom of Stalingrad. In North Africa, Hitler eschewed taking Malta, instead letting Rommel rush into Egypt, where his advance halted at El Alamein. In the end, German forces on both fronts held positions that were extended and exposed. Soviet and British counteroffensives resulted in catastrophic German defeats.

Citino ascribes these defeats to several causes. The first of these is geographic, although Citino is more implicit than explicit here. The Wehrmacht was designed to execute decisive, annihilating campaigns. This was best done in relatively confined geographic areas. Poland and France fit that requirement nicely. Russia, with its vast spaces, was another matter.

Mindset was another cause. For the Germans, being on the offensive was the only way to conduct a war, a mindset that included both Hitler and Halder. In 1942, the Germans resumed offensives, especially in Russia, when they might have considered a more prudent, defensive posture.

According to Citino, radio killed independence in subordinate commanders. Mistrustful of his commanders, Hitler increasingly sought to micromanage affairs and radio gave him the ability to do so. Here Citino is on thinner ground. Every advance in communications technology provides a temptation to higher authority to violate its chain of command downward. The self discipline of the leader is what matters. In the case of Hitler, self discipline was never his strongest trait. [End Page 308]

The book, like all of Citino's works, is engagingly written, although marred by some editorial glitches. While his research is not based on documents, Citino's notes show a grasp of the enormous corpus of literature on this subject that is second to none. This makes the book especially valuable for the reader who is new to the subject. Taken all together, Citino's well written and thoughtful study will be of great value to experts and novices alike.

Richard L. DiNardo
Marine Corps Command and Staff College
Quantico, Virginia


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 308-309
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Archive Status
Archived 2010
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.