In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Aesthetically Effective, Imperialist Retrograde
  • Patrick Brantlinger
Peter Havholm . Politics and Awe in Rudyard Kipling's Fiction. Burlington: Ashgate, 2008. xi + 187 pp. $99.95

The basic question Peter Havholm sets out to answer is why much of Kipling's fiction is aesthetically effective when his imperialist and racist opinions were so retrograde. This puzzle has always been central to Kipling criticism. At the outset, Havholm cites a number of critics for whom, as Daniel Karlin puts it, "What is powerful and convincing in Kipling's art is so mixed with what is repellent and sometimes mad in his outlook … that it is hard to make the case for him as an artist without engaging in a defense of his politics." The question regarding Havholm's study is whether he adds anything new to the conversation. Part of his solution to the puzzle concerns "awe," as his title suggests. "Awe" or "wonder" seems to be a close relative of exoticism:

… Kipling's stories please his readers by evoking wonder at human actions whose political, cultural, and biological economies are presented as separate from those in the world in which readers actually live, in two senses. Kipling's stories almost invariably distance readers from actions and passions represented as wondrous: one is invited always to be awed rather than to become involved.… Secondly, many of Kipling's characters and actions are set in dream worlds so that his ideas can work perfectly.

By implication, at least, India as viewed through the rosy-tinted lenses of Anglo-Indian ideology was itself a "dream world."

Havholm provides close, insightful readings of many of Kipling's stories. He usefully contextualizes these readings in terms of Anglo-Indian ideology—"the voice of the Sovereign," as he calls it. He thoroughly illustrates the attitudes and beliefs of the British administrators, businessmen, and soldiers in India, including Kipling's parents, partly by quoting from the journals, such as the Civil and Military Gazette, to which they contributed. Of special note here is his father's brief essay, "A Word on Indian Progress," which Havholm includes as an appendix. Havholm emphasizes Anglo-Indian reactions to the 1883 Ilbert Bill, which, until amended, "would have allowed Indian judges in the mofussil, the country outside the Presidency districts (of Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta), to try" Europeans.

Before the Ilbert Bill controversy, the major event that shaped Anglo Indian ideology was the "Mutiny" or Rebellion of 1857–1858. It crops up occasionally in Havholm's study, as when Kipling himself, writing to Cormell Price, declares: "I can't trust myself to write calmly about [End Page 81] that [Ilbert] 'Bill.' Old stagers say that race feeling has never run so high since the Mutiny. If there should be a rising, the present Government are directly responsible at least so everyone says." The "rising" Kipling refers to is apparently not a rebellion on the part of Anglo-Indians opposed to the Ilbert Bill; he seems to believe that even the slight encouragement the Bill gave educated Indians to think of themselves as equal to Englishmen might lead to something like the earlier Rebellion. That thought suggests in turn just how paranoid Anglo-Indian ideology was when Kipling arrived there as a teenager, in the midst of the Ilbert Bill controversy.

At the heart of Anglo-Indian ideology was a partronizing racism that affirmed British rule as a permanent fixture, because Indians were incapable of governing themselves. Havholm writes: "The Anglo-Indians who taught Rudyard Kipling his political philosophy believed that the Indian people required protection because of their ignorance—and that it was the duty of Britain's servants in India to care for them, care enough to devote lives to learning their infinite variety so that they might best be protected from themselves." So confident was Kipling in expressing this "political philosophy" in "the voice of the Sovereign" that his version of Empire takes on virtually utopian, "dream world" overtones. This is what allows him to bring Kim, as Havholm notes, to such a "joyous" and "loving" conclusion. The danger to India that Kim helps to foil is external to it—the not very threatening meddling on the northwestern frontier of Russian...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 81-83
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Archive Status
Ceased Publication
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.