In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Problematizing Global Knowledge: The Theory, Culture & Society Encyclopedia Project
  • Eugene Thacker
Problematizing Global Knowledge: The Theory, Culture & Society Encyclopedia Project edited by Mike Featherstone et al. Theory, Culture, & Society Issue 23.2-3 (2006). Sage Publications, London. 616 pp., paper. ISBN: 0263-2764.

There is a story by Borges in which a protagonist searches for a missing volume in an encyclopedia set. Actually, the search begins with an encyclopedia entry about a remote, mysterious land that may or may not exist. The search for this missing place, however, ends up being a search for a missing book. To make things more complicated, it appears that one particular encyclopedia set does indeed contain the missing volume, while all others do not. Rapidly, the search for the textual verification of a physical place recedes behind a search for a mode of verification itself. In a classic Borgesian move, geography and textuality, two of our primary modes of verification (“I was there”; “it’s been documented”), thus end up undermining the search for knowledge itself.

The encyclopedia Problematizing Global Knowledge does not—as far as I know—contain any mysterious missing entries. However, its mode of assemblage does nevertheless encourage a critical stance toward contemporary modes of knowledge-production, of which the immaterial labor of academic institutions is a primary example. The flurry of academic texts that claim to distil specialized knowledge into “readers,” “key terms” anthologies and “very short introductions” is a perplexing phenomenon. From the naïve point of view, such books can be helpful as secondary material or as an entry point into difficult primary material. However, anyone who teaches will attest to the fact that the reality in the classroom is that such books often metonymically stand in for the primary texts (the extreme version of this would be the condensation of, say, all of media studies into algorithms, haiku or a version of Rimbaud’s zutique poems).

On the surface, Problematizing Global Knowledge is exceedingly readable and comprehensive. It is broken up into sections that are thematically arranged—“Network,” “Life/Vitalism,” “Classification,” and so on. While its focus is on knowledge production in a globalized context, its scope is broader than the vaguely named field of media studies. This is “media studies” as an expanded field. The entries are written by authors known and respected in their areas of specialty. Furthermore, the entries in a given section do not simply sing a chorus of consensus; there are differences between entries that are more indicative of the richness and heterogeneity of media studies than many of the more reductive textbooks currently available. Originally published as a special issue of the journal Theory, Culture, & Society, the volume is set to be re-published as a book, with additional responses by invited authors. It also forms the first of a series of like-minded encyclopedias to be published by the Theory, Culture, & Society (TCS) collective.

The challenge, then, is how to approach the task of producing knowledge in such forms as the encyclopedia [End Page 191] without totality or closure. Among other things, Borges’s story, “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius,” attempts to think the encyclopedia without closure. Paging through Problematizing Global Knowledge, edited by the TCS collective, we can see another, though similar, approach. Whereas Borges uses fabulation to open the encyclopedia, the TCS collective has used appropriation. What form does their encyclopedia appropriate? Well, the form of the encyclopedia, of course. The opening sections aptly deal with the concept of knowledge and the form of the encyclopedia itself. Each entry in this section patiently unravels the very form in which it is instantiated through its coverage of the main issues and themes centering around each entry. Such problems concerning epistemology are not only raised by Diderot and d’Alembert, but they are also fundamental ontological problems of sets and inclusion that reach back to Plato. Thus, while there is no Borgesian missing volume, the TCS encyclopedia offers breadth and coverage but in a reflexive way that always refers back to the form of the encyclopedia itself. (This is the “n-1” of encyclopedias. Or better, an Encyclonomicon.)

For over 20 years now, the TCS collective has been...

pdf

Share