Abstract

This article compares voyage narratives printed in Richard Hakluyt's 1589 Principall Navigations to contemporaneous travel histories in an effort to contextualize the epistemological status of each group of texts and debunk the former's reputation for greater factuality. It critiques the use commonly made of Hakluyt's narratives in literary studies, arguing that the privileging of these texts over other sources results in postcolonial studies that ironically valorize a type of writing which promoted the colonial mindset these studies seek to expose.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1935-0236
Print ISSN
0034-4338
Pages
pp. 768-794
Launched on MUSE
2008-03-27
Open Access
No
Archive Status
Archived 2009
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.