Abstract

The blockbuster hit of the year 2000 reached theaters less than six months before the contentious U.S. presidential election. Gladiator spoke directly to the issues that haunted the 2000 campaign, using the Roman empire of 180 C.E. to stand in for a contemporary America longing for moral leadership and republican values. But the restored Roman republic will presumably be utterly unlike the democracy promised by the film's Marcus Aurelius. Gladiator used allusions to the 1960 Spartacus in order to appear progressive before finally giving the people, a dull lot addicted to the violent entertainment of gladiatorial combat, the custodians they clearly need—good men in the aristocratic senate supported by a loyal military. This paper explores the parallels between the Republican strategies of 2000 and the republican sympathies of the film.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1080-6504
Print ISSN
0004-0975
Pages
pp. 185-204
Launched on MUSE
2008-03-04
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.