In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The Gentle Subversive: Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, and the Rise of the Environmental Movement
  • Andy Karvonen (bio)
The Gentle Subversive: Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, and the Rise of the Environmental Movement. By Mark Hamilton Lytle . New York: Oxford University Press, 2007 Pp. x+277. $23.

Rachel Carson's classic Silent Spring was published more than four decades ago and continues to serve as a touchstone for environmental and community activists. Carson is best known for her ability to engage a wide audience in the wonders of scientific discovery and the natural world. In this biography, Mark Lytle, a professor of history and environmental studies at Bard College, presents a concise and highly readable narrative of Carson's life from her childhood to the publication of Silent Spring and beyond, and he largely succeeds in explaining her enduring reputation.

In her early career as a U.S. government researcher, Carson struggled in the male-dominated natural sciences and was relegated to summarizing and editing the work of her colleagues. Her subordinate position was both a curse and a blessing; while she was not allowed to pursue her own field research, she used her editing role to hone her skills in translating the latest scientific research into compelling and accessible language that aroused and attracted a general audience. Gradually, Carson built a literary reputation [End Page 242] and was able to quit her government position to work full-time on books and articles on oceanography, shore ecology, and other nature topics.

Not surprisingly, the high point of Lytle's biography describes the writing, publishing, and public reception of Carson's most famous book, Silent Spring. She first became interested in pesticides in the 1940s but wisely shelved the project in a postwar political climate that was not prepared for a critique of scientific and technological progress. When she finally embarked on pesticide research in earnest in the late 1950s, it was a significant departure from her previous writing due to its underlying current of moral outrage. Jokingly referred to by her friends as the "poison book" and having a working title of "Man against the Earth," Silent Spring was not a polemical tirade against pesticides but rather an exposé of the unintended consequences of injudicious use.

Carson relied on the network of scientific experts from her federal government days to argue persuasively for the limited use of pesticides, and, in effect, she became an early example of a counterexpert in environmental politics. She was particularly concerned about the exposure of toxic chemicals to unaware individuals, predating the public right-to-know laws that would emerge in later decades. The success of Silent Spring is all the more impressive because Carson had to fight gender bias and a dominant, largely unquestioned chemical industry as well as a battle with cancer that took her life less than two years after the book was published.

Beyond the discussion of Silent Spring, a second valuable section of Lytle's biography is his discussion of Carson's philosophical roots. She first developed a reverence for nature through her deeply religious upbringing and was later influenced by the radical ecological views of philosopher Alfred North Whitehead and biologist Charles Elton. Most significant to her writing was Whitehead's "new ecology" perspective that replaced the reductionist approach of natural science with a holistic and interdependent worldview. Organicism broke away from the mechanistic worldview held by natural scientists and provided a moral grounding for Carson that would later surface in the work of the deep ecologists. Surprisingly, Carson's critics did not tie her holistic perspective of nature to the heated political debates about communism and socialism in the 1950s.

Unfortunately, Lytle's narrative is not sustained after Carson's death. The epilogue consists of an all-too-brief rundown of environmental issues from the early 1960s to the present without making a convincing case for the influence of Carson's work. It would have been helpful for Lytle to compare the Silent Spring controversy to contemporary issues such as climate change, genetically modified organisms, and nanotechnology. Carson is clearly a progenitor of counterexpertise, civic science, and activities aimed at democratizing scientific and technological development policies, but Lytle...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 242-244
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.