In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Standing Bear is a Person: The True Story of a Native American's Quest for Justice
  • Matthew Garrett
Stephen Dando-Collins . Standing Bear is a Person: The True Story of a Native American's Quest for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2004. 252 pp. Paperback, $18.00.

In Buckskin and Blanket Days: Memoirs of a Friend of the Indians, Thomas Henry Tibbles introduces his chapter on Standing Bear with a prophetic passage. He predicts, "Someday a historian will take up the tale of those years scientifically examining the United States court decisions in the cases which I was the means of bringing to trial, and searching the records in Washington and the newspaper files which told the daily events. Finally, he will write a permanent, reliable account of a very vital chapter in our nation's history" (Doubleday and Co., 1957, 193). Attempting to answer this call, Stephen Dando-Collins relates the story surrounding the watershed trial and its immediate consequences.

One of the few Plains tribes never to militarily engage the United States, the peaceful Ponca Tribe of Nebraska suffered alongside the Sioux at the close of the Indian Plains Wars. By May 1877 the punitive reality of removal penetrated the Poncas reservation, and the tribe was reluctantly relocated to arid lands in Indian Territory adjacent to the Quapaws. Plagued by disease and death, a delegation of twenty-seven Poncas led by Standing Bear secretly escaped and trekked west to bury the chief's recently deceased son and reestablish themselves on their confiscated Niobrara River homelands. While resting at the Omaha reservation, the Poncas were arrested by General George Crook on orders from Washington.

Omaha Daily Herald editor Thomas Tibbles took up the small band's cause, [End Page 659] finding pro bono lawyers and launching a major media campaign. Defended by constitutional lawyer John Webster and renowned railroad attorney Andrew Poppleton, Standing Bear won a ground-breaking court case centered on the chief's recognition as a living person. Judge Elmer Dundy ruled that the right to habeas corpus, as well as to other inalienable rights, must be extended to any individual abandoning his origin nation for participation in the American system. Funded by the Omaha Ponca Committee and later the Boston Ponca Committee, Tibbles embarked on a series of public tours. They featured not only the editor but also the Ponca chief, a young Omaha woman named Bright Eyes (Suzette La Flesche), and her brother Frank La Flesche. Meanwhile, eastern newspapers came into conflict with each other in defending either Standing Bear or the U.S. government. Finally, after reviewing rival reports from a presidential inquiry and Secretary of Interior Carl Schurz, Congress offered the Poncas their choice of lands in Nebraska or Indian Territory in March 1888.

In reconstructing the events surrounding Standing Bear's trial, Dando-Collins relies heavily on works by Henry Tibbles, who produced Ponca Chiefs (a collection of relevant documents strung together by his own narrative), Buckskins and Blanket Days (an autobiography), and numerous Omaha Daily Herald articles. Tibbles's clear self-promoting nature and overt propaganda campaign is now reintroduced with disturbingly little discretionary filtering. Tibbles's high regard for his allies and disgust for the opposition surfaces throughout Standing Bear is a Person. Dando-Collins even employs many of Tibbles's dramatic adjectives and certainly maintains the same characterizations of participants. In total the Omaha editor accounts for just over half of Dando-Collins's footnotes (50.3 percent). Consequently, opposing sources such as the Omaha Daily Bee newspaper, perspectives of Secretary Schurz, and intensions of "half-breeds" who originally accepted removal are either minimized or completely ignored.

While a few grammatical problems surface in the text, the bulk of its problems arise from the overdependence on Tibbles as Dando-Collins revitalizes the Omaha editor's unintentional Eurocentric interpretation and romanticization. Indians are regularly described in misplaced contexts, such as the embellishment of Bright Eyes as a "princess" or the description stating that Chief Iron Eye "possessed an intelligent round European face" (8). Poncas "progressed" from earth lodges to wooden cabins, and elsewhere Indians "grunted with approval" (18, 29). Further, the tale's heroes are romanticized to...

pdf