Lesotho's postcolonial state land-reform project has failed to produce intended outcomes. Mainstream explanation points to the antagonism of customary chiefs to state-sponsored reforms, because these were meant to curtail their power over land. First mooted in 1973, when the first land-tenure reforms were attempted, this explanation has been uncritically accepted as immutable truth by a majority of academic commentators and policymakers in Lesotho and elsewhere. I argue in this paper that this explanation is a fable, superficial and shallow, and that the failure of the postcolonial Lesotho land-reform project can fruitfully be explained by reference to the ideology of the regime that assumed state power at independence in 1966, and not by simplistic reference to the antagonism of customary chiefs per se.


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 91-111
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.