In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Manoa 12.1 (2000) 139-146



[Access article in PDF]

The Chinese Poem: The Visible and the Invisible in Chinese Poetry

Michelle Yeh

Translating Asian Poetry: A Symposium

In his 1928 introduction to Pound's Selected Poems, T. S. Eliot lauded Pound as the "inventor of Chinese poetry for our time," but continued: "This is as much as to say that Chinese poetry, as we know it today, is something invented by Ezra Pound. It is not to say that there is a Chinese poetry-in-itself, waiting for some ideal translator who shall be only translator." Eliot clearly recognized the creative transformation involved in translating poetry from one language to another, hence his distinction between Pound's translation and "Chinese poetry-in-itself."

Although it is well known that Pound's translation is a particularly free, often ingenious rendition of the Chinese--fully justified in view of his Imagist project--what neither he nor Eliot could have foreseen was how powerful and lasting this translation would be in shaping poets' and translators' perceptions of Chinese poetry. In recent decades translators of Chinese poetry have given us many wonderful translations that are far more faithful to the originals than Pound's; interestingly, however, the "Chinese poetry-in-itself" that they strive for remains informed by aesthetic and cultural assumptions that underscore the earlier modernist model. In "The Poem behind the Poem," Tony Barnstone expands on the work of a long line of poet-translators--from Pound to Kenneth Rexroth, Gary Snyder, and, most notably, Wai-lim Yip--in describing the Chinese poem as "imagistic," consisting of "largely pictographic characters," and presenting a moment of "empty, pure perception." If for Pound the metaphoric basis of Chinese characters was central to his translation of Chinese poetry, Snyder, Yip, and Barnstone tend to emphasize the nonfigurative quality of Chinese poetic imagery and further link it to a state of mind that resonates with a Daoist or Zen Buddhist sensibility.

Despite some modifications, Pound's formulation of Chinese poetry as "ideogrammic" underlies what Robert Kern calls "the standard conventions for the representation of Chinese poetry in English." Borrowing from Eliot, may we not say that "the Chinese poem" in the English-speaking world is a Western invention?

By referring to the Chinese poem described above as an "invention," I am not denying that those qualities exist in Chinese poetry. I am suggesting, however, that the act of choosing certain poems for translation always [End Page 139] presupposes what a Chinese poem is in the mind of the translator, which further influences the way the poems are translated. What does not get translated is at least as revealing as what does. It is therefore meaningful to look at the Anglo-American modernist paradigm of the Chinese poem in terms of what it accentuates as well as downplays, what it gives a value to and at the same time excludes.

The quintessential Chinese poem is, as suggested by many American poet-translators, imagistic. Pound pointed out in "How to Read" (1928) that visual image--phanopoeia--is the most translatable part of poetic language. It is natural, then, that visual imagery receives the most attention in translation. But the tendency to see the Chinese poem as a concatenation of concrete visual images with few discursive elements is inseparable from the conception that the Chinese language is "largely pictographic" or ideographic. Such a view, with a long history that goes back to Catholic missionaries in the sixteenth century, is based on the notion that Chinese written symbols are visual embodiments of particular things in nature rather than artificial signs of phonetic import. Despite efforts by sinologists--for example, Peter Boodberg, Yuen Ren Chao, and John DeFrancis--and others to dispel the myth, it remains strong to this date, and it is but a short step from seeing the Chinese language as pictographic to seeing Chinese poetry as an unmediated expression of the concrete world of experience.

While it is generally true that imagery is a major component of all poetry, the kind of imagery emphasized in the Chinese poem is...

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1527-943x
Print ISSN
1045-7909
Pages
pp. 139-146
Launched on MUSE
2000-04-01
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.