In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviews in American History 34.3 (2006) 399-406



[Access article in PDF]

Seeing the Forest and the Trees:

Visual Culture in American Conservation History

Finis Dunaway. Natural Visions: The Power of Images in American Environmental Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. 272 pp. Illustrations, notes, and index. $37.00.

On the night of March 23–24, 1989, the Exxon Valdez veered out of its shipping lane and ran aground on Bligh Reef in Alaska's Prince William Sound. Eleven million gallons of oil contaminated the sound and coated twelve hundred miles of shoreline, killing birds, mammals, fish, and shellfish. More than fifteen years later, Exxon Valdez and images of oil-soaked seals, birds, and fish dead or gasping for life remain ingrained in the American collective memory and serve as a signal reminder of nature's fragility and the human capacity to devastate the physical environment at a point when further advances on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and Alaskan oil reserves have become a key point of controversy in American politics. Another, less universally remembered oil spill afflicted the Pacific coast of Oregon, when the New Carissa ran aground near Coos Bay on February 4, 1999. The spill was far less severe—"only" seventy thousand gallons—but newspapers up and down the coast printed photographs of the beached Japanese tanker emitting flames and plumes of black smoke as rescue crews desperately tried to burn as much oil as possible before it seeped into the sea. In all, before the ocean ripped the New Carissa in two, two hundred thousand gallons of bunker and diesel oil had been burned, considerably reducing the potential extent of the damage to the sea and sea life. Ironically, in 1989, in the hours immediately following the Valdez's grounding and before the oil began to disperse, the suggestion of burning the oil was dismissed; Exxon could not afford to be seen to be acknowledging their responsibility for the spill and feared that images of the tanker engulfed in fire would constitute a public relations nightmare. The nightmare came anyway, as news reports showed countless images of nature in jeopardy, prompting public outrage and Congress's swift passage of the 1990 Oil Pollution Act.1

Exxon's reluctance to ignite the tanker stemmed from a visual idea of politics, public relations, and memory. Their public relations experts mistakenly [End Page 399] interpreted pictures of oil-soaked seabirds and blackened, dead fish as benign beside the roaring flames that would have attempted to minimize the amount of oil spilled. Maybe they figured that the remoteness of the spill and the ecological damage would seem distant to most Americans, whereas fire might be perceived as a more universal symbol of ecological distress. Or, perhaps, they recognized the extent of the hazard and sought to limit or contain its cultural impact by not providing another set of images that Americans could associate with their company and their mess; after all, most attempts to burn oil on sinking tankers typically have had little meaningful impact. Whatever their rationale, the case of the Exxon Valdez makes two enduring points about the nature of American responses toward the environment: first, that non-human nature is precious to Americans and a key component of American identity, and second, that the American idea of non-human nature is effectively—even primarily—communicated through visual imagery. These two points serve as the cornerstone of Finis Dunaway's fine and carefully researched book, Natural Visions: The Power of Images in American Environmental Reform, though he adds a third related issue: that the concerted production of visual imagery has played a pivotal role in manufacturing American ideas about nature.

Natural Visions belongs to a branch of environmental history that explores cultural responses to nature as spectacle.2 Cultural environmental history is a growing area, and Dunaway does well to link it to the equally popular work on the history of environmental policy. This is an important connection to make. Too often, environmental historians have limited their work to one branch of the...

pdf

Share