In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The Failure of Grassroots Pan-Africanism: the case of the All-African Trade Union Federation by Opoku Agyeman
  • Kwamina Panford
Opoku Agyeman, The Failure of Grassroots Pan-Africanism: the case of the All-African Trade Union Federation. Lanham: Lexington Books (hb US $131.00 – 0 7391 0620 1). 2003, 392pp.

At a moment when African leaders and Africa watchers are preoccupied with the new African Union, its New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), and the G8’s proposed solutions to Africa’s problems, Opoku Agyeman’s book is timely. It is a carefully interwoven account of grassroots Pan-Africanism, labour activism, and the sacrifices of radical Pan-Africanist leaders whose efforts were thwarted by conservative and neo-colonialist opportunists. According to Agyeman, the latter – as well as the failure of grassroots Pan-Africanism in the labour and political spheres – contributed immensely to missed opportunities to empower the majority of Africans to overcome, through a strong political union, the continent’s underdevelopment and lack of dignity.

Agyeman provides ample insights into why one of the rare Pan-Africanist organizations – the All-African Trade Union Federation (AATUF) – failed to unite African workers and to contribute to Africa’s economic liberation. This is a notably interdisciplinary study of Pan-Africanism that spans labour studies, international relations, intra-African relations and the Cold War. Some of the issues addressed include the viciousness of the Cold War, how some African leaders were made to choose sides, and how that may have led some Pan-Africanists to rescind their membership of the Socialist International. According to Agyeman, these Pan-Africanists preferred to focus on the unique manner in which colonialism and neo-colonialism were antithetical to Africa’s development. The Eastern bloc (led by the Soviets) would rather wage class struggles across the globe.

Agyeman uses the case of the AATUF to detail how Cold War rivalry severely hampered Pan-Africanism from achieving its goals of complete political and economic liberation and development of Africa. While the Cold War raged, both the West and the East used Africa to pursue their selfish goals. In this regard, this book is strongly recommended to the new student of Cold War politics and Africa and to the experienced practitioner who needs to refresh his/her memory about how devastating the Cold War was to Africa. Agyeman is able to place Africa’s problems in a context broader even than the Cold War when he observes that, ‘Pan-Africanism’s central goals of continental equality with the rest of the world … entailed a basic transformation of African society and thereby of world society.’ He cites Emmanuel Wallerstein to explain why the West in particular abhorred Africa’s unity and progress: ‘it was precisely because the dangers of unity were so great to the “existing world system”’ (p. 28).

Agyeman’s main theses, abundant documentary evidence and copious quotations should arouse the reader’s interest in why African leaders – especially those enamoured of NEPAD, the G8 and recent IMF/World Bank programmes [End Page 285] to solve Africa’s problems – are so enthusiastic about collaborating with so-called international development partners. Reflecting on Agyeman’s theses in this book, one ought to be mightily sceptical about the efficacy of the newly proposed economic bail-out for Africa, including debt relief and the highly indebted poor country (HIPC) status clamorously sought by African leaders. Donor activities and their impact since the Cold War vindicate his deep doubts about reliance on donor assistance. He is thus right in emphasizing the need for caution and making a clarion call for undiluted Pan-Africanism as still the single most important solution to Africa’s development ills.

For those seeking lessons from history to inform policies and actions to ameliorate Africa’s dire conditions, Agyeman’s book is highly recommended because, as the wise adage goes, those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it. [End Page 286]

Kwamina Panford
Northeastern University


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 285-286
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.