Abstract

This article argues that literary studies have proceeded in two different ways to establish itself as an academic discipline. One way, the attempt to provide a theoretical basis for a discipline of criticism which would have guaranteed the 'scientific' nature of literary studies, has failed. The other way, the development of a set of standards for scholarship in literary studies and as a part of that the introduction of a method of 'reading' that sets standards for correct 'observation' of the literary work, has led to a partial success, and has represented the 'progress' in the discipline. However, the success has only been partial: the question still remains if literary criticism can provide an adequate defense for its disciplinary status.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1080-661X
Print ISSN
0028-6087
Pages
pp. 341-358
Launched on MUSE
2005-09-23
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.