In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The semantics and discourse function of habitual-iterative verbs in contemporary Czech by David S. Danaher
  • Zdenek Salzmann
The semantics and discourse function of habitual-iterative verbs in contemporary Czech. By David S. Danaher. (LINCOM studies in Slavic linguistics 22.) Munich: LINCOM Europa, 2003. Pp. 114. ISBN 3895864536. $69.60 (Hb).

In this study, David S. Danaher reexamines the meaning and function of Czech habitual-iterative verbs such as říkávat and dělávat, derived from the corresponding simple imperfective forms říkat ‘to say’ and dělat ‘to do’, respectively. Among the questions D asks are: How do such derived verbs differ in meaning and usage from their underlying forms, and what kind of iteration do they express? Earlier studies of the subject varied from a feature-based approach to one that took into account context. The most recent collective survey of the structure and use of Czech concedes that iterativeness is a semantic category of a verb whose status is not yet completely clear.

D’s analysis is based on a corpus of data from sources of contemporary literary Czech including essays, fiction, memoirs, scholarly writings, and journalistic [End Page 520] prose (the oldest source is Karel Čapek's Obyčejný život (Prague: František Borový, 1934)). After critically examining previous scholarly treatments of the meaning of Czech habitual-iterative verbs, D outlines his semiotic and cognitive approach to the data in the corpus.

Drawing on Peircean semiotic theory and on cognitive linguistics, D argues that the combined approach to accounting for the patterning of the Czech data can be applied not only to verbs and nouns but also to behavior in general; that the notion of habituality is the mediating structure to be used for a successful comparison across tenses; that Czech habituals function as grammatical space-builders (adverbials, prepositional phrases, certain verbal predicates, and some grammatical constructions and forms); and that while imperfective simple verbs in iterative contexts tend to express simple iteration, habitual verbs must express habitual iteration. He adds, though, that ‘my analyses of these . . . questions [do not] necessarily represent the definitive word on them; in fact, most of them would likely benefit from further analysis as well as a cross-linguistic perspective’ (108).

This highly specialized study would be of particular interest to those who know Czech well and can appreciate the many examples D uses to illustrate his points.

Zdenek Salzmann
Northern Arizona University


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 520-521
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.