In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The Claims of Kinfolk: African American Property and Community in the Nineteenth-Century South
  • Kevin D. Roberts
The Claims of Kinfolk: African American Property and Community in the Nineteenth-Century South. By Dylan C. Penningroth ( Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. x plus 310 pp. $49.95 cloh $19.95 paper).

Moving beyond the generalities that have plagued historians' understanding of both African societies and African American history, Dylan C. Penningroth crafts a significant contribution to the literature on nineteenth-century black life in the United States. Fusing an African Studies approach with an innovative method for understanding the complexities of black families, communities, and social relations, Penningroth's Claims of Kinfolk is an excellent model for social historians to follow.

The author's central thesis is not only that African Americans owned property in informal, extralegal ways, but also that the very nature of their property ownership offers insight into intricate social relationships and overlapping kin networks. Penningroth attempts to redirect scholarship on black Americans from the traditional focus on black-white interaction, to an understanding of internal divisions that blacks in the nineteenth-century South created, and had to negotiate. Emphasizing property, Penningroth argues, is the best way of achieving that goal.

For some readers, the author's methodology for understanding that issue may be curious: the book begins not in the antebellum American South, but in Gold Coast, West Africa. Penningroth claims two reasons for analyzing postemancipation Gold Coast: first, the "remarkably similar circumstances" there and in the [End Page 1116] American South, particularly in the imposition of a formal law system following the demise of slavery; and second, "to look outside the assumptions and interpretive frameworks of American history" (p. 15). Emphasizing that both former Gold Coast slaves and former American slaves held similar views on family, community, and property, Penningroth offers the Gold Coast example for comparative value rather than for advancing an argument about African cultural "survivals." Nonetheless, in spite of the author's explicit attempt to move away from the African cultural "survival" scholarship, his main argument that "property was at the heart of African Americans' ideas about family and community" rings quite similar to much of that work. Implicitly, at least, Dylan Penningroth draws a picture of former slaves in Gold Coast centering property in their family and community relationships, and of former slaves in the United States doing the same; while the author rejects any attempt to connect African Americans' view of property, family, and community to their African ancestry and cultural heritages, he seems caught up in that type of language.

Following his discussion of Gold Coast, Penningroth shifts focus to the American South, where, he argues, slaves had developed a view toward property quite similar to that of their counterparts in western Africa. In Chapters Two and Three, Penningroth seems to be at his analytical best, as he adds important wrinkles and contours to historians' understanding of slaves' informal economy. Much more than just the savvy use of free time, this economy represented an acquisitive nature not unlike that of their masters; unlike their masters, however, African American slaves developed a rather communal sense of property. "An object became property," the author argues, "by being associated publicly with people. Each piece of property usually represented the labor and interests of several people, including the master" (p. 108). Using the rich records of the Southern Claims Commission and an inventive employment of the WPA slave narratives, Penningroth succeeds in showing his readers that slaves not only owned property, but conceived of it in fundamentally different ways than did whites. Describing slaves' property as being "enmeshed in several overlapping, sometimes competing, social relationships" (p. 108), the author infuses American historiography with a decidedly Africanist perspective, namely in emphasizing kinship as an organizing force in American slaves' informal economies and property ownership.

This relationship of family to property changed dramatically during Reconstruction. In the last three chapters of the book, the author explores how the imposition of a formal legal system disrupted, and largely ignored, these informal arrangements of property ownership that existed prior to emancipation. In addition to the predictable exploitation of former slaves by former masters...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 1116-1118
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.