Abstract

In June 1961, a stringent set of welfare cutbacks in Newburgh, New York, received widespread public support and incited a racist backlash against welfare throughout the nation. Less than one year earlier, however, an even harsher set of cutbacks aimed specifically at black recipients of Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) in the state of Louisiana provoked a mainly critical public response. This article illustrates how the rhetorical framing and historical context of these two sets of cutbacks shaped the divergent public reactions to them. In 1960, many northerners sympathetically described ADC in Louisiana as "child aid," a grant targeting poor black children in the civil rights-torn American South. In the Newburgh case, however, ADC was referred to as "unwed mother aid," a grant supporting the supposedly lazy and luxurious lifestyles of African-American women who migrated to the North. By examining the language and issues of these cutbacks, this article reveals a crucial moment in the evolution of our contemporary antiwelfare discourse.

Additional Information

ISSN
1527-2036
Print ISSN
1042-7961
Pages
pp. 10-33
Launched on MUSE
2000-02-01
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.