In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • “He is but a Bastard to the time”: Status and Service in The Troublesome Raigne of John and Shakespeare’s King John
  • Edward Gieskes

Introduction

Shakespeare’s King John, standing between the two tetralogies, marks a transition in his treatment of political and historical questions. This argument has been advanced by critics like Sigurd Burckhardt, Virginia Vaughan, Michael Manheim, and Marsha Robinson (among many others). 1 Vaughan, for example, writes that the play “demonstrates Shakespeare’s experimentation with more sophisticated dramaturgical techniques to convey political complexities, techniques he perfected in the Henriad.” 2 Most of the criticism focuses on Shakespeare’s changing treatment of political questions to the exclusion of social considerations; but if King John marks a transition in Shakespeare’s treatment of politics and history, it also marks a change in his depiction of the social issues attendant on that history and politics. 3 This essay will focus on the Bastard, arguably the central player in the action, as representative of the play’s engagement with expressly social concerns: issues of class, rank, and vocation distinct from the explicitly political issues which have been discussed 7elsewhere.

Despite the limited historical records concerning the Bastard Faulconbridge, both Shakespeare and the author of The Troublesome Raigne of John King of England make him a major player in the “history” of King John’s reign. 4 The different treatments of the same figure in these two plays represent different understandings of service to the crown. In the Troublesome Raigne, Philip Faulconbridge claims royal ancestry (after direct supernatural prompting) and proceeds to behave as a person of noble descent. He goes off to war in France, pursues and kills Austria, receives lands, and woos Blaunch, all as though he had always been a member of the aristocracy. By contrast, Shakespeare’s Bastard Faulconbridge exhibits a very different relationship towards his own rise in status. His status as adopted Plantagenet is treated by the play as a vocation in our modern sense of employment. By the end of the [End Page 779] play he administers the royal succession to the throne without any real opposition from the hereditary nobles around him. Shakespeare’s Bastard actively chooses a career as a royal servant in choosing to acknowledge his bastardy while the Bastard of the Troublesome Raigne is forced to avow his ancestry, against his better judgment, and in this involuntary manner enters the aristocracy, and from thence comes to royal service. The two plays exhibit alternative conceptions of identity—one chosen, the other essential—which are linked to the ability of each character to serve his King.

I

Both King John and the Troublesome Raigne contain a recognition scene—each play’s Bastard finds out the truth of his birth in the public and legal context of a land (or succession) dispute. In King John, the Bastard and his brother “come from the country” for judgment and in Troublesome Raigne they, having “committed a riot,” appeal to the King on the issue. 5 In both plays, Robert Faulconbridge accuses his elder brother of being illegitimate and thus barred from inheriting the family estate. 6 The basic claim is identical but details of its presentation vary considerably. 7

In the Troublesome Raigne, Philip (the Bastard) presents himself as the victim of his younger brother’s slander and greed: “the wrong is mine; yet wil I abide all wrongs, before I once open my mouth to unrippe the shamefull slaunder of my parents, the dishonour of myself, & the wicked dealing of my brother in this princely assembly”(T, 86–90). He refuses even to address the “shamefull slaunder,” in the best tradition of wounded honesty. Then Philip’s younger brother Robert speaks, making his case in the face of his brother’s silence. In the initial encounter the Bastard presents himself as slandered and offers no hint that he might know or believe his brother’s accusation to be true. In the Troublesome Raigne, then, the Bastard believes he is the legitimate heir and desires his inheritance; it is only as a result of external intervention that he resigns his claim. 8

Shakespeare’s King John treats this scene differently. In the Troublesome Raigne, when King...

Additional Information

ISSN
1080-6547
Print ISSN
0013-8304
Pages
pp. 779-798
Launched on MUSE
1998-12-01
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.